[gas_dr]

Your post 93 takes something out of context and then you espouse your incorrect and nonclinical knowledge repeating talking points. When called on it by another physician you fail to demonstrate any knowledge or credential to validate your opinion.

So you can play rhetorical games forever but you just plain wrong.

[BiglyCommentary]

I asked you to be specific. "takes something out of context" is vague and nebulous. Do you tell patients to "take something"? What specifically did I take out of context?

When called on it by another physician you fail to demonstrate any knowledge or credential to validate your opinion.

That is simply a flat out lie. More vague, non-specific broad brushed noise.

They made several claims. To one I posted CDC statistics. One I rebutted with current clinical studies that made the NIH change their recommendation. Do you too claim that treatment X is effective or not, just because a few of your patients claim to have taken it, with out you knowing the amount, the frequency, the duration, other special factors that might have worked against it's effectiveness? That is what I called out. Junk medical conclusions on effectiveness that would get laughed at.