You posted before reading further. I now get that and more.
Follow up questions.
Is it only the spike protein being produced by the mRNA or are there any others produced and does it match the virus protein 100%?
Is the shot 100% spike protein mRNA, carrying medium and preservatives?
If the spike protein is the infective mechanism via the ace2 receptor and mutation of the virus rna expression of the protein would render it non-infectious, why are the vaccines not 100% effective against the old and new mutated forms of the virus? Does it have other infective mechanisms?
Do the antibodies produced have any activity against normal human tissue? I have seen a small study of recovered Italian men having much lower motile/viable sperm counts post infection and given the stated world population intentions of the people pushing the vaccines so hard it raises my eyebrows.
Sorry you’re right. I only read your initial post and replied to that. As for your follow up questions, I’m probably not the best person to ask. I’m a chemist with some knowledge of biochemistry, so while I understand the protein synthesis mechanism pretty well, more technical issues surrounding the vaccine are not within my realm of expertise.
With that disclaimer , my understanding is that it is only the spike protein that is encoded by the vaccine mRNA. Whether it’s 109% accurate or not, I am not sure. It’s accurate enough to elicit immune response that is effective against the virus, as shown in the clinical trials.
As for the composition of the vaccine, I believe it’s the mRNA, preservatives, and lipid nanoparticles designed to facilitate transfer of the mRNA through the cell membrane. There may be other ingredients; I truly don’t know.
I truly can’t even venture a guess on your third question; I have no idea what the infection mechanism of the virus is, nor any knowledge of what differences are present in the variant forms of the virus.
Antibodies typically are mostly harmless to human tissue. There are some with autoimmune disorders for whom this is untrue. Again this is far outside of my expertise, but the effects you mention on sperm counts and motility were among men infected by the virus. There’s no reason to think that whatever effects turn out to be confirmed were caused by or related to antibodies rather than effect of the viral infection. If it’s infection rather than antibodies causing the effects, then vaccination would tend to reduce the prevalence of them.
Again, though I’m certainly not the best person to ask about this, and I’ll gladly defer to any of the medical professionals who have already been posting on this thread if they have different/better answers.