“Because there is no significant data if a previous infection promotes long term immunity. The vaccine can act as a booster shot.”
And what significant information is there that says the vaccine can act as a booster shot or produces better immunity than having had the virus?
Also note that the transgenic nature of the vaccine has zero track record because the mRNA method is making its debut as a vaccine - it has been used to kill a lot of animals by making them susceptible to cancers, etc., and has caused “escape” problems when used to make “better” crops - you, know, tomatoes that taste like crap but which last longer on the shelf, etc.
You might want to buff up on transgenic agents before making such definitive statements.
Since you have ZERO historical data on mRNA based vaccines, your opinions are no better than Kamala Harris’s opinions on how to create more middle class jobs.
People should believe more in major drug company’s research regarding vaccines than anonymous bloggers seeking attention.
Include me in the category of people who have more faith in major drug companies than any individual blogger.