I believe all of these things have been designed and carried out to bring elites to a position of complete control and the motivating forces are greed, lust for power, and a misplaced fear of climate change.
We need to think about how to fight back against this. Having a science-based debate about climate change is a losing proposition for our side. We need to have an economy and free will based debate about it. For me, it’s more important to put the question of rising sea levels in a larger context, and not to surrender to this hysteria about preventing the unpreventable. It’s either unpreventable because it won’t happen, or because it will inevitably happen anyway. Either way, the science becomes largely irrelevant, we can’t stop the rising of seas (although they may not rise), we should plan to adjust and mitigate, rather than destroying both the economy and civil liberties, the travel industry, the hospitality industry — all to take a wild swing at the unknown actual result of the draconian economic programs our elites plan to unleash.
And because they know most people will be opposed, they have designed methods of enforcing compliance and reducing dissent. The COVID seems to be entirely designed to promote those aims.
My only criticism of Trump would be the opposite of the elitist critique, he wasn’t Trumpian enough to stop them.
More and more, I come to the belief that if we don’t act with considerable force against this globalist coup, our freedoms will be lost for generations. Out of the ruins of their failed political and economic experiments may come a renewal of liberty, but by then they will no doubt have succeeded in totally altering the demographics of North American countries. We will then have to hope that the immigrants they bring in will be as hungry for liberty as we should be today. I don’t like that bet, do you?
I noticed that FR made a plea for adherence to the non-violent, non-insurrectionist principles that probably made sense in 2000. Do they make sense now? There will come a point where (I believe) a widespread understanding will develop that we have no other options but resistance. If they control the voting and social media platforms, then we will need to think about feasible time lines, a lot of the resistance would come from older adults who will age out of the fight eventually. This is partly what the globalists are counting on.
I’m not an especially radical person — if I am thinking like this, chances are high that many millions are also thinking like this.
Sooner or later, the Climate Change boogeyman will fail to appear. Then what??
What will fill that vacuum in the party apparatus???
There are a couple of non-violent, extremely useful tactics I can see being employed to counter the “elites,” both of which must be extremely comprehensive, and EXTREMELY well-funded.
For one, a network that functions as a completely honest source of news. That means NO partisanship and NO propaganda for either side of a story. A network that establishes itself, day one, as a stringent reporter of NEWS, not the opinion of its reporters and producers.
BUT this network is also dedicated to covering those who have hitherto been uncovered ... The so-called “elite” of business, politics and entertainment. Those heretofore faceless “masters of the universe” who aren’t used to having a reporter show up at their luncheon, asking questions about how their public statements don’t seem to match their political contributions. And then showing up the next day, and the next ...
But this is America, of course, so coverage should also include a little TMZ, New York Post-style digging. For example a reporter and photographer showing up at the golf course to ask the normally-comfortable tech CEO about his son, who was so unfortunately arrested the other day in regard to a drug-trafficking investigation. “That was in Belmont, wasn’t it sir? Don’t you have extensive real estate holdings there? Have the authorities contacted you about that?”
The second tactic, which has been running through my head for some time, would be establishing — again, an EXTREMELY well-funded — investigative agency dedicated to ferreting out corruption in government at every level. It always stuns me how people just seem to nod and say, “Okay, sure” when they read a news story saying that an agency suspected of corruption is investigating itself. A private agency with pull and dedicated to probing government corruption has been needed — oh, well, since the first government was formed.
I emphasize the “extremely well-funded” aspect because we have websites and small networks aplenty trying to do this sort of thing, but they’re doing it for the most part under the radar — cable channels in a comparatively small amount of households, websites that do good work, but are not household names. For either of these operations to work, they would need to hit the ground running, with enough PR and advertising to get above the chatter, and instantly noticed and credible.
These ventures — perhaps done in tandem — might well put the fear of God in the “elites” — where it belongs.