Replies

The chain of evidence on Weiner's laptop is rock solid and it doesn't include NYPD. Weiner handed over an iPhone, iPad and laptop computer to Granite Intelligence on Sept. 23, 2016. This was documented by Granite.
~~~~~~~~~
I don't consider the chain of evidence on Weiner's laptop rock solid.

For NYPD to wash its hands of it (ordered from the top), just bring in Granite and scrub NYPD. Unfortunately that seems to include police officers. That seems easier than the FBI "losing" notes, files and other exonerating information re Trump, Flynn for example.

The Deep State does this for a living - they make prosecution disappear and reappear at will.

I don't understand how a court would consider a private intelligence company part of the court's chain of custody. I always see chain of custody starting with police officer, handing off to forensics etc. Those related departments have exacting protocols etc. I doubt an organization like Acme Intelligence, or in this case, Granite Intelligence, is considered within a court system's chain of custody.

I know that it can be applied to include individuals (like a meth addict and his drugs - part of the chain is the meth addict, proving he had it in his custody). But if violating some tenet of the chain of custody for a police department breaks the validity of the evidence, how does having an outside organization like Granite swearing they didn't let anyone else access it, etc. maintain it. In fact Granite's involvement makes me distrust it.

How do we know Granite and the NYPD didn't lie, albeit for different reasons?

By the time a higher up was said to have nixed the Weiner laptop (might have been SDNY federal attorney or prosecutor), and police realized what was about to happen, why would they insist they had it in their possession? They Knew their brass would confiscate or reject it as a case. Especially after being told by their superior they couldn't have it. So PD lets go and Granite picks it up.

The account you provided means we have to have 100% trust in...Granite? We're watching the House, Senate, DOJ, FBI fake their prosecutions and cover up for Hillary. Whom could we trust with Hillary's secrets? Would have to be a known white hat for us to have any faith that when they say it was protected or never in NYPD, that was the truth.

Which agency or outside organization doesn't think it would be a problem to retain evidence that could implicate Hillary in heinous crimes? Why would Granite feel safe holding the laptop?

Might be that Granite is the investigative equivalent of Dominion software. It can have all the branding it wants, corporate office and certifications, but Dominion is still deep state.This is part of the legacy of the Deep State; "official procedures, just like inaugurations broadcast world-wide, can no longer be trusted. :(

I seem to recall having a like discussion with Hostage. smart guy..mad research skills...thorough..used to be a regular here.
He tried to prove NYPD was involved. It was a rather interesting give and take. I think it was on a "Q" anon thread.

What you guess vs what is known...and you are going with that fairy tale?
100% confidence in Granite vs. your science fiction?

If it's as you say, and NYPD participation was made to go away, then how does this story even get written?

It was Weiner who handed off his devices to Granite on 09/23/2016. How do you get around that?
Oh...NYPD and Granite lied and go about pulling off your proposed plot?

You are right...who knows what went on from 9/23-9/26/2016 when the devices were in Granite's possession.

Granite has been around for awhile. If they mishandle "evidence" how long would they stay in business?
If they suborn perjury how long would they be in business?

I never chased any paperwork regarding Weiner's turn-ins to Granite - how they were secured etc...
9/23/2016 was a Friday - 9/26/2016 was a Monday -> warrant issued 2:57p.m.
Granite was given a receipt by FBI on 09/26/2016 for each item seized at 5:00 p.m.

The FBI agent affidavit that justifies the warrant claims "The subject's devices have been securely maintained since their transfer to the security firm's custody"

How did SDNY know to get a warrant for a pickup at Granite? oh, they were in on it?

The warrant authorizes law enforcement to have access...no mention anywhere of NYPD or any LEO' outside the FEDs.

Did you ever read TruePundit's original article? See any timelines? See any precincts? See anything in that article you know to be true? Most of the details about the laptop and the scenarios about it belong to the FEDs as specifically stated in the Horowitz report.

What's not even close to being true is "...a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under Commissioner," It's not the highest rank under Commissioner. NYPD has a bazillion chiefs. I stopped calling\emailing\ chasing those too.

In order for your plot to take place everybody and their brother was in on the conspiracy larger than he OJ conspiracy...and yet not one word leaks ?

Good Grief...

Now, with that said, here's the FOIL I filed to the NYPD(And I am sorry I never appealed - I suppose I could file again, being more specific) and where my assertions start going south

I sure infer that NYPD has an active case going on here or is involved in an active case

This is where I stopped. How was I to know so would everyone else.

This is part of the legacy of the Deep State; “official procedures, just like inaugurations broadcast world-wide, can no longer be trusted. :(

++++++++++

Good Evening RN, Thank you for your skepticism of the Granite documentation, which I share. Here is a bit of evidence that I offer. I am the sauce and you can make of it what you will.

In the spring of 2019 I was visiting my parents and sister in a small town in north Florida. Lent was approaching and I went to mass at my parents’ parish on Sunday. The homily that day was given by a visiting deacon. The deacon was there to give the parish Lenten mission the following week. The deacon introduced himself and gave an interesting, brief biography. He was a retired New York Police Chief. After retiring he felt a call to serve and had been ordained a deacon, and was spending his retirement taking people on pilgrimages and giving missions.

After mass, I introduced myself, told him I was a visitor, and thanked him for helping the parish by preaching the Lenten mission. I then asked him a question, telling him it was not about his present calling. I asked him if he were still close to the people of the NYPD, having been a chief and now a deacon. He said he was. Then I told him that I had read of bad things on Anthony Weiner’s laptop that had sickened personnel of the NYPD and had he heard anything.

His face grew serious, he looked me straight in the eye and said, “Depravity that you cannot imagine.”

I thanked him for sharing that with me and wished his mission well. He gave me his business card, which I still have.

Again, make of it what you will, and thank you for all your efforts with this thread. It is indeed a home, meeting place, and a haven in these stormy times.

VR/Pat