You came in with the null hypothesis,
"Q is false unless proven true, and I reserve the right to move the goalposts arbitrarily; and to assign my own presuppositions as axiomatic, but to falsely accuse others' hard-worked-out-and-vetted conclusions as mere airy statements with no substance";
and the belief "I do not have to lift a finger but have everything given to me on a silver platter";
and "I get to claim that since the real life identities of some people who have helped to interpret Q drops, is not sufficiently academically prestigious, or now DC-beltway-insider-enough for my tastes, that perforce the entire thing is a massive case of self-hynosis."
Those who are genuinely neutral but puzzled, frame their objections in a different way.
And if they are brainwashed by the MSM, they bleat loudly what CNN and MSNPC tell them to think; until we begin to teach them to think for themselves.
You engaged in what C.S. Lewis called "Bulverism" -- the practice of refuting an opponent by explaining WHY they are wrong, and dismissing them, before actually demonstrating THAT they are wrong.
That's why they get treated differently.