I should have stated Wictor differently. He is not a Q guy. You are correct. But my opinion has been that he’s given us rational info in light of Q. He and several others have given us good analysis for a long time. Especially it’s good to note Wictor’s anti-Q in this because our group has learned critical thinking with regard to these long term resources. We’ve learned to separate wheat from chaff.
And FreeQs have always disagreed on best sources or even reliability of sources. But we’ve learned things about each source. And learned about paytriots.
This could be just my opinion, but these late-comers have not had time to be vetted well. They claim secret sources, but we haven’t heard from them long enough to gauge whether these “sources” are realistic.
Over the long haul, an example is Scott Kesterson. He alludes to inside sources but having listened to him for years I have a vague notion of where Scott’s sources may be and how reliable they *might* be. I could well be wrong in guessing. But Parke and some of the others are just too new on the scene to me to have confidence.
Wictor may not be with Q but he has a fair track record. I’m probably just old and set in my ways but I don’t like the roller coaster ride of guessing about the new guys when we are right at this finish line of term 1.
I agree, that’s why I look at the new sources with several grains of salt. Interesting but TBD is the way I look at.