The person who posted this follows the tried and true methods of trolls, post and no reply.
Go ahead. Keep pissing us off.
Those congress people have declared themselves and our Capitol building sacrosanct, while we the citizens, our buildings, our homes, our businesses, and our lives, and finally our votes, hardly weigh into their balances, if we weigh at all.
They became afraid. They who are always so highly protected, with the use of our tax dollars. This is to them the highest of crimes.
Can you imagine the fear of all the many, many citizens who have been accosted in multitudes of ways, and even killed, by their leftist paid for and organized mobs, for months on end last year, and who they still threaten us with?
Their lives, their doings, their work place are no more sacred than any single American citizen’s are.
No, they aren’t some kind of holy priesthood, more higher and important than all the rest of us. They are not some kind of royalty. They may think they are, but they and their situation is not one tiny drop more important than the lowliest of American citizens, whom they have been utterly derelict in their duty towards.
Congress spends more than $700 billion annually on national defense, and the U.S. Capitol gets sacked in five minutes by the equivalent of a fraternity prank? LOL.
And so this is how this silly farce of what used to be a great nation ends ... U.S. Navy ships that can't even avoid crashing into other large vessels, a cheating scandal at West Point that goes unpunished, and Viking Horn Guy proudly grinning for photos while standing at the Senate President's throne dressed in his face paint and Chewbacca outfit.
I think there’s some truth to what you wrote. I don’t completely agree, but I do see your point. I usually like to learn about those that post something that makes me think deeply about an issue. Usually, I read some of their former posts & comments. I looked at yours as well. No offense intended- just a genuine question. Are you honestly a conservative? Looking through everything, nearly everything you write seems adversarial towards conservatives. You explain limited government fairly efficiently when discussed in broad context- but seem to take swings at fellow conservatives quite frequently. You seem to mock social conservatives, Trump voters, voter fraud, conservative protests & seem to feel very little disagreement- let alone contempt- for the one-sidedness of both big tech & the media. I realize there’s a major rift amongst conservatives between the historic mainstream philosophical conservatives & the Trump-loyalist populists, another between the far right & moderate conservative wings, and another still between those that are loyal conservative Republicans & Independent swing voters. Your posts & comments read more like a guy who’s left-of-center- but has decided to join a conservative site, use a conservative name, claim a conservative philosophy, yet somehow manage to spend all of his time knocking conservatives instead of liberals. If I’m wrong- my apologies! If I’m right- why do people do that? I’m sure it happens on both sides to some degree. It seems like the people who do it do so from a place of utter contempt for those with a differing philosophy. Instinctively, i’ve never desired joining a progressive site so I could troll my political adversaries 😉
Frankly it’s become more than a little confusing with so many, and frequent, opinions on pretty much everything in dispute today....and we’re suppose to agree with their supposed qualifications and experience to speak on the matters. The other confusion is determining if companies are just protecting their companies ‘rather than’ the immediate response and label they are either leftists or right-wingers, Democrat or Republican. What I do know is it’s difficult sorting out all the propaganda, and everyone is volling to fill any gaps they see as opportunity to build their brand, businesses or web site etc.etc.
Too much dust in the air!
This entire screed is a dishonest pile of merde.
This was a psyop DESIGNED to link Q with anarchy.
The FACT is it was Antifa/BLM, and they were ESCORTED in by the DC police.
It’s that simple.
Whoops, I just checked your inception date - your a troll.
My bad. Don’t feed the trolls. July 2020.
It’s a
“Liability Thing”,,,
.
Guess that’s Okay then.
/$
If I read the article correctly, the author seems to suggest that the rigging of the election didn’t happen, and that Pres. Trump didn’t foresee it. That alone makes me suspect the entire article.
How does the author explain the hundreds of thousands (or millions) of votes switching from Trump to BiteOne? How does he explain the mountain of video, documentary, and testimonial evidence of fraud? Pres. Trump said the election was rigged because IT WAS.
Author also seems to disregard that Antifa infiltrated the mass of people at the Capitol. Trump supporters didn’t start jack schitt. Violence came from Antifa. Antifa may not answer to the military-industrial complex, but they sure as hell answer to the Satan and his minions.
And how is it that the author fails to mention the certification of electors itself was an invalid process? The valid concerns of multiple states were not addressed, and certainly not given a fair hearing. Pence could have at least kicked the matter of the electors back to the disputed states, but he did not. Then there’s that elbow-bump with Pelosi and the coin(s) put into his hand at the end. Is that not Deep State-ish?
Whatever Q is or is not, author appears to be trying to paint him / it AND ALL OF US with the same broad brush.
Freely admitting that I could be mistaken. If so, it’s an honest mistake. If I have fears about this situation, it’s that instead of the Kraken, it’s Cthulhu that’s been awakened.
Synopsis of this article: the deep state opposes freedom of conscience.
But we already knew that.
By the way, Grossman. You need to learn how to be more concise in your writing.
Since he bases his whole view and analysis on the false claim there is “no evidence” of election fraud, the whole argument collapses. There are tons of evidence and testimony which people like Grossman has chosen to dismiss or ignore. We need a new way to attack this nonsense. I suggest:
“He falsely claimed there is no evidence of election fraud without making any attempt to examine that evidence and he furthered that same election fraud by supporting efforts to suppress or destroy the evidence.”
Real violent revolutions have police dogs, water cannons, mass arrests, running gun battles, and the top dog taken out and shot (Romania) or tortured with a bayonet (Libya) or hanged (Saddam Hussein).
The best this could do was old ladies taking selfies between the movie-theatre-foam-rubber-partitions, and the only person shot was one of the protesters, an unarmed middle-aged mother of three.
There are even photos of the "rioters" cleaning up a spilled garbage can.
And Congress was back to their original business in what, 4-6 hours?
Think, for once in your life, OK?
The person who posted this follows the tried and true methods of trolls, post and no reply.
I apologize for doing that. It absolutely was not my intent to troll with this post. I was just about to go to sleep when I found the article, and I thought it was very interesting, so I posted it. Again, I apologize for doing that.
Given the age of my account I don't expect anyone to read anything I contribute, so I was rather surprised to find people had read it overnight and were openly discussing it.
I also tried to make sure I was not editorializing with my opening comment, particularly with regard to Q and Anon culture. (I am not Anon in the 2021 sense of the label, but I participated in Operation Chanology back in 2008.) It's difficult to have a debate when the opening round sounds like Gore Vidal vs William Buckley from the get-go.
I posted this article because I thought it provided an alternative viewpoint that was clear and logical. As I stated at the beginning, it helps explain the behavior of various political actors in such an abrupt fashion. I also believe it can provide context for the potential backlash from law enforcement towards Patriot organizations, et al.
What I explicitly did not do was editorialize the content I posted. I presented it as-is, in its entirety, not a cherry picked excerpt to drive a particular narrative.
My bad. Don’t feed the trolls. July 2020.
Yes, my account is young, but I have lurked since the mid-2000s (not that I can prove it). I have also joined the joined the dollar a month club in the two most recent Freepathons. I don't see your name on the board, going back to at least 2018. You could, of course, have requested that your donation be anonymous, so I suppose we will never know the truth of that issue. In any case, why would a liberal troll help support a site that they consider evil, racist, blah blah?
CA....
its called the “UniParty” ....whose primary focus is to keep ping-ponging Red-Blue off of us all.
Its how they remain in power