Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: WildHighlander57

From my understanding, such as it is, ALL the sections don’t have to be in play at all. Since everyone dispersed, no need for Sec.334 at all. And Sec.331 is governoers asking, and that isn’t relevant, and if governors so ask, they’re in charge of the NG, no POTUS. Sectinos 332 and 333 are relevant aither one could be applied, or both, and not just the NG could be utilized. Many states have defied the enforcement of federal law regarding elections (as well as sanctuary state crap) and in some cases, their own state laws in connection with elections. And any state with election fraud has deprived citizens of their rights. Add to that the attempt to overthrow the US government by those and other actions. Sec.333 can also cover all the covid tyranny - depriving people of constitutional rights of assembly, speech, worship, freedom of travel, etc.

Copying Secs 332 and 333 for reference:

Sec. 332. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or
assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable
to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial
proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use
such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress
the rebellion.

Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means,
shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any
insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States
within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege,
immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the
constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right,
privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes
the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the
equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.


3,165 posted on 01/13/2021 1:11:22 PM PST by little jeremiah (Thirst for truth is the most valuable possession and no one can take it away from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3152 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

“1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States
within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege,
immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the
constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right,
privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or”

OK The “impeachment” qualifies. Time for the Military.


3,317 posted on 01/13/2021 4:20:00 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( Yes...I am in a weird mood! NO I did not break that Nanxi doll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson