I wrote “Why was no tear gas or other non lethal response deployed before the mob approached the perimeter where lethal force would be used” Note the word BEFORE. You’re making it sound like these were Zulus swarming over the perimeter at Roarke’s Drift and the cop had no choice but to mow down the surging horde.
Yet the other cops didn’t fire. I don’t buy “reaction time” as an excuse. Didn’t the shooter retreat into an elevator after firing? That doesn’t fit the last stand of the Capitol police scenario. I just can’t see this as situation as you describe it.
i told you I agreed there were security failures. There should have been non-lethal force. BREAKING NEWS: The Capitol Police Chief resigned.
I am only approaching this from the point of view of the shooter, a federal cop charged with protecting Congress, and not know the motivations or intentions of a mob, because quite frankly, those intentions cannot be fully known— only that they broke through all other security lines.
Zulus? Really?
All there has to be is a federal building with a cop charged with protecting people with his life and a threat to those people. This isn’t an emotional argument. The final defensive position takes all the guesswork and emotion out of it: the cops had no where else to fall back to.
FAFO. She found out.
You are 100% correct.
Left by elevator, multi statements and vid confirmation BEFORE vids are made grainy, cut shot to not show before and after, and conflicting statements on social media throw doubt on what’s been seen recorded and referenced.
So the last line scenario is, was and always shall be plausable IF the person did not walk off after assassination of the unarmed female.
Who stood in that person’s place, that last line AFTER the action.
FF BS assassination.