I believe you’re correct. The envelopes are verification of names and addresses, and the inter-envelope around the ballot, I’m not sure about its information, if any.
Politzer’s testimony emphasized absolutely nothing is pertinent but the ballot itself, to determine if is filled in by hand or arrived already filled in by a machine, whether the ballot paper came from China or domestic and other important factors that easily recognizes a fraudulent ballot.
I think he said he can quickly identify legal voters with state voter rolls and recognize those who voted more than once. It was a marvel all the conditions he could track. And, in all categories, mail in, provisional ballots, deceased voters in the state and county, whose names were pilfered and used on a ballot.
Offered to do it all Free, in a day. Two hours, in a county.
I still remember watching Richard Baris, and how dismayed he was when he realized that while they were counting, they didn’t seem to know how many ballots they had (this was mainly Georgia, if I remember correctly). That’s the number they should know from the beginning as soon as the voting has concluded and the deadline for mail in ballots has passed.
It’s pretty crazy that the didn’t know — even days later.