Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RitaOK

I still remember watching Richard Baris, and how dismayed he was when he realized that while they were counting, they didn’t seem to know how many ballots they had (this was mainly Georgia, if I remember correctly). That’s the number they should know from the beginning as soon as the voting has concluded and the deadline for mail in ballots has passed.

It’s pretty crazy that the didn’t know — even days later.


420 posted on 01/04/2021 11:43:57 PM PST by ConjunctionJunction (President-Elect Conjunction Junction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies ]


To: ConjunctionJunction; All

Plausable Denials 101

Regards


441 posted on 01/05/2021 1:59:49 AM PST by Swiffer_Ralf (Orig. Eureka_Lead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

To: ConjunctionJunction

ConjunctionJunction wrote:

“I still remember watching Richard Baris, and how dismayed he was when he realized that while they were counting, they didn’t seem to know how many ballots they had (this was mainly Georgia, if I remember correctly). That’s the number they should know from the beginning as soon as the voting has concluded and the deadline for mail in ballots has passed.

It’s pretty crazy that the didn’t know — even days later.”

They didn’t know because the total number of ballots were messed with by the ballot-dump and machine software cheating.

The percentage for each candidate wouldn’t be known without having the total number of ballots for the denominator, and votes cast for candidate x for the numerator.


472 posted on 01/05/2021 4:35:28 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

To: ConjunctionJunction

See this article “beyond the trees” about the vote stuffing and millions to one odds of it occurring normally:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3921601/posts

“A new report from a number of reputable, PhD statisticians analyzes the suspicious floods of ballots trickling in following the November 3rd election, concluding all were in favor of Joe Biden.

The report analyzes “vote dumps” – a “25,000+ vote differential between Presidential candidates, received/recorded at one time.”

“The conclusion is that all we were able to find were net Biden Dumps,” the report summary notes.

Analysis extends to states both won and lost by President Trump, including Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Several states experienced more than one vote dump, but all netted in favor of Biden.

In Georgia, which saw dumps net Biden 119,811 votes, there were two “10-sigma jumps” on November 4th at 01:42:47 03:23:48 UTC.

“Ten-sigma jumps have a probability of 1 in 10^23,” the report notes.

Similarly, Michigan saw a vote dump net Biden 135,290 votes, with the probability of such phenomena occurring equating to “1 in 10^117 — or 14 Powerball wins in a row” per the report.”


482 posted on 01/05/2021 5:48:18 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson