Posted on 01/01/2021 5:06:31 AM PST by MtnClimber
“It didn’t even take four hours later where moving trucks with this stuff was backed up to those buildings trying to get rid of the evidence.”
Earlier this week, inventor Jovan Pulitzer testified before the Georgia Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections. Among other things, he explained that he had the capability of testing half a million ballots in two hours to determine which were legitimate and which were fraudulent. After confirming that the results would be 100% accurate, the committee unanimously voted to have him check all the absentee ballots from Fulton County.
The first thing that probably ran through many of your minds (I know it did mine) was if we even know and trust the status of those ballots in terms of their security.
Well, now it seems it didn’t take the left more than just a few hours after the committee voted to have him test the ballots before large trucks started pulling up at the location in question.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
“When asked about the current status of how, or if, the ballots are being secured, he said he couldn’t disclose details, but alluded to attorneys who charge enormous fees and seem to be defending you, when, in fact, they’ve set you up. He brought up Michael Flynn as an example of someone who was exploited in this way and ended by saying that it’s almost impossible to know who to trust.
They have long been destroying evidence.....
the women in GA who reported the burning of military
ballots for Pres Trump
called 911 - ignored.
reported to the f’n GA Police(owned by China and Ukraine)
and everyone should be arrested and in jail forever -ignored
reported to SOS - laughed at and ignored.
GA is no longer a believable State.
If they can get away with this, then you KNOW Tuesday’s election will be stolen again, the same way as the first time.
The answer you asked for is Yes and Yes.
As have all fraud centers, along with and electronic or paper records.
If they have not then it will be done this weekend.
You don’t kill a person then leave the weapon in a crime scene bag with your name and address and details of the murder in a letter addressed to the police, they murdered Our Countries future, our Children’s future and they have laughed every moment it was done.
They think we are sheep, their property to be forced into obeying whatever their feelings dictate.
They are very very very wrong.
Who is behind this?
Oh, no! It’s the Democrats again!
Oh wait...
During an interview with Monica Matthews yesterday, Pulitzer said (in addition to confirming that China was online in the voting system being used in real time yesterday)
Who is behind this? The answer is almost certainly: Barack Obama. Who gave the order to stop counting in the five or six major cities after midnight of the election? It was well coordinated and ordered by a single source. Barack Obama’s people are being appointed to again serve in the Biden/Harris government. Barack Obama NEVER LEFT Washington DC.
This election steal is the THIRD term of Barack Obama.
Where’s the FBI?
Even if they find a way to replace bad ballots to keep the count correct it should be fairly easy to detect, or would it? In that case the key would be to examine the envelopes.
Destroying the ballots from the general election may be tied in with the runoff election. If they were able to separate a large number of individual mail in ballots from the general election and prove they were fraudulent it is likely they would have votes for the senate races also. Purdue only failed to achieve the 50% number required for outright victory by about 15,000. If sufficient invalid votes were subtracted from his opponent, the runoff would be invalidated.
Sure they are. People don’t want to go to jail.
Gotta have some sympathy for those Dem workers. It’s either destroy the evidence and hope for a lenient prosecutor, or leave them to be analyzed and be guaranteed a high probability of being Arkancided by the party powers.
Did Jesse James rob trains?
The problem with relying on any examination of the envelopes is that you have no way to tie that envelope to a specific ballot and the only remedy would be to discard all absentee ballots. That is not likely to occur due to the emotional argument about disenfranchisement of legitimate votes. The beauty of Mr Pulitzer’s method is that he is able to detect the individual fraudulent ballot. As to the ballots being replaced, he would likely be able to detect that also unless they were all machine folded, unfolded, handled, folded again and run through the counting machines. (Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to deceive.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.