Great detail noted by the fraud auditors - when the ajudication process takes place, the original ballot image is DELETED by Dominion software - when the “recount” and limited “audit” took place, it was using the REPLACEMENT ballots that resulted from the “ajudication”. Once again, as a software industry professional with background experience in election systems, I am continually amazed at how the Dominion system appears to be designed for fraud. As an architectural consideration, one would ALWAYS want to have the original image(s) retained and NEVER deleted.
Thanks Steven.
You can tell by design what the system was set up for.
An honest company would have put in place as many fail-safe
features as they could to prevent fraud.
A dishonest company would have put in place as many places
for potential fraud as they could.
From what I’ve heard, the Dominion system is it’s own worst
testimony to what it’s goals were from the start.
Thanks for your postings on this.
It is amazingly obvious and the outcome of all of this is going to have to be amazing.
I was finally able to watch the whole GA Senate Committee hearing.
The evidence is OVERWHELMING about what occurred. (I know ... we all knew that ... but this was extremely well presented and rock solid ... should have convinced anyone left to convince.)
It is hard to comprehend what is taking the politicians so long, to DO WHAT THEY SWORE TO DO.
Sorry, I was out running errands. In regards to the adjudication process, look at how many ballots were deliberately dumped into that because of the off calibrated registry on the printed ballot.
People voted for Trump, but because the oval wasn’t where the scanner thought it should be, the ballot got kicked out. The Fulton County BOE chairman was shown in a clip. Out of some 113,000 ballots scanned, like 107,000 needed adjudication!
So much fraud! God help us.
Great detail noted by the fraud auditors - when the ajudication process takes place, the original ballot image is DELETED by Dominion software - when the “recount” and limited “audit” took place, it was using the REPLACEMENT ballots that resulted from the “ajudication”. Once again, as a software industry professional with background experience in election systems, I am continually amazed at how the Dominion system appears to be designed for fraud. As an architectural consideration, one would ALWAYS want to have the original image(s) retained and NEVER deleted.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
those must be the ‘deleted’ ballots that went to the shredder!