Twitter is allowed to operate and censor as they choose (in order for the public to see how corrupt they are), but there are certain accounts which Twitter is constrained from touching. (Either by cyberwar means or by whitemail, or some other means).
I have believed this is what’s been happening for a long time. Why? Because Twitter is banning/censoring/suspending like crazy, yet there are certain pro-Q accounts that Twitter hasn’t touched - or has only slightly touched.
If I’m correct, that explains much of what we are seeing. If I’m wrong, then I would have to consider why certain pro-Q accounts are not being banned. Are those accounts actually derp accounts? That seems unlikely to me. Too much good info in them, even if disinformation is mixed in. JMO.
***********************
Tis a puzzlement
Twitter is allowed to operate and censor as they choose (in order for the public to see how corrupt they are), but there are certain accounts which Twitter is constrained from touching. (Either by cyberwar means or by whitemail, or some other means).
I have believed this is what’s been happening for a long time. Why? Because Twitter is banning/censoring/suspending like crazy, yet there are certain pro-Q accounts that Twitter hasn’t touched - or has only slightly touched.
If I’m correct, that explains much of what we are seeing. If I’m wrong, then I would have to consider why certain pro-Q accounts are not being banned. Are those accounts actually derp accounts? That seems unlikely to me. Too much good info in them, even if disinformation is mixed in. JMO.
***********************
Tis a puzzlement
***********************************
Maybe the White Hats control Twitter and they are directing Twitter to get rid of the chaff- some derp accounts that are misdirecting people and aren’t useful in terms of incriminating derps further and the accounts of autists the White Hats don’t control and who are just making wild, unreliable guesses at things and leading people down unproductive rabbit holes.