Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant

I was a daily reader of Newsmax at one time because there was reporting on Clinton scandals. Then after the dust settled from Clinton’s impeachment I heard an interview where Ruddy said it had hurt him deeply to report negative things about his good friend Clinton. Never read Newsmax again.


939 posted on 12/28/2020 11:40:53 AM PST by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 915 | View Replies ]


To: nclaurel

Newsmax is fine for now.

Until Trump cancels his endorsement of them.


971 posted on 12/28/2020 12:14:53 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies ]

To: nclaurel

I didn’t know that. It is possible that Ruddy was the outlet that Clinton used to print negative news, to get it out there so they could mould it and contain it. They were exceptional at that...they made Lewinski about oral sex instead of the actual sex and the perjury. They made Hillary’s emails about how they were obtained, not what they contained.

I watched Newsmax a few times over the past few years, and was not impressed. I went back to it after Fox went south, and it was acceptable for a while, but they are back to going along with the deep state narrative, at least many of their anchors. So I didn’t stay. Always loved OAN, but they repeat their stories every hours, so you can’t watch them all day. Hopefully, they can get some funding and develop into a full-fledged operation.


1,014 posted on 12/28/2020 12:50:28 PM PST by Defiant (If the Media and Social Media are going to run things, when do we get to vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson