Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nclaurel

I didn’t know that. It is possible that Ruddy was the outlet that Clinton used to print negative news, to get it out there so they could mould it and contain it. They were exceptional at that...they made Lewinski about oral sex instead of the actual sex and the perjury. They made Hillary’s emails about how they were obtained, not what they contained.

I watched Newsmax a few times over the past few years, and was not impressed. I went back to it after Fox went south, and it was acceptable for a while, but they are back to going along with the deep state narrative, at least many of their anchors. So I didn’t stay. Always loved OAN, but they repeat their stories every hours, so you can’t watch them all day. Hopefully, they can get some funding and develop into a full-fledged operation.


1,014 posted on 12/28/2020 12:50:28 PM PST by Defiant (If the Media and Social Media are going to run things, when do we get to vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies ]


To: Defiant
It is possible that Ruddy was the outlet that Clinton used to print negative news, to get it out there so they could mould it

Wow I hadn’t thought about that angle but it seems very possible. Ruddy was quite sincere about his friendship with Clinton. We have been so manipulated and lied to for so long anything is possible.

1,078 posted on 12/28/2020 2:11:54 PM PST by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1014 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson