[bagster]

I was talking about your agreement with this.

You said: No, they are more insidious than that, infiltrating boards, populating forums, fitting in, gaining trust, and then dropping little morsels of disinformation. Sowing seeds of distrust and misrepresentation. Creating slides and ultimately reaping discord.

I would not be at all surprised to find a handful of freeqs whose only goal is to inflame any disagreements into conflagrations. Once again, this is all just my humble opinion. Take it with a grain of salt.

Derp Noob Troll Says: Certainly far better worded than I could do. I dare say this, I’ve always thought some of the Qs are being used yet they’re unaware of it.

This was the agreement I was talking about.

[rwfok]

I was talking about your agreement with this.

I guess I’m just not following your train of thought. It’s agreeing with me does not equate to me agreeing with it.

I made a statement about how I believe trolls infiltrate sites and threads to ultimately disrupt. Even those that you might not at first suspect, “stealth troll” as opposed to “outright troll”. Is that in dispute?

The fact that it chose to glom on to my statement to further slander posters here does not put me in agreement with its reasoning.