I guess I’m just not following your train of thought. It’s agreeing with me does not equate to me agreeing with it.
I made a statement about how I believe trolls infiltrate sites and threads to ultimately disrupt. Even those that you might not at first suspect, “stealth troll” as opposed to “outright troll”. Is that in dispute?
The fact that it chose to glom on to my statement to further slander posters here does not put me in agreement with its reasoning.
That's why I said, you inconveniently find yourself on the side of this derpish noob troll.
Its a trick as old as Jack Black.
The troll will find something to agree with and use that as a lever to infiltrate and manipulate the conversation. Very 'inconvenient' when that happens. Its 'Troll 101'.
My comment was more for him than you.
Now I see that this was all just a ruse to stick me with post 666.
I'm tricksy like that.
#BagsterMajics
