I think the US SCourt is altogether an interpreter of law in the event of a dispute.
Alito and other justices (to my surprise) evidently do individually rule over districts courts of law, as assigned.
This ruling perhaps gets adjudicated in a grievance setting that will surely come to pass, in a filing by either the Trump Campaign or by any PO citizen who acuses their state for non-compliance with Alito’s ruling and causing fraud.
It might all then rise to the US Supreme Court, where there will doubtless be a hammer dropped to cause imprisonment and issued by either the state AG, or the new US Attorney General for flagrant non-compliance, against several failed officials; governors, SOS, AG’s, and other elected or appointed election committee members.
etc.
Guessing.
The problem is the SC won’t hear the cases. How can there be any ruling?