ThankQ!
CheshireTheCat wrote:
He probably should have typed “amidst” instead of “against.”
I wouldn’t make too much of it. He’s busy, and the president’s whole team is busy and probably getting only 4 hours of sleep a night.
He phrased something awkwardly. The people he read it to before posting aren’t getting much sleep either and didn’t pick up on the awkward phrasing. To them, it sounded fine because they know what they meant and were probably hearing and seeing it as saying they are fighting against the fraud, not against the evidence.
Think of how many times you read a Freeper’s comment and it didn’t make sense at first and then you figure out they probably meant a different word than the one they used.
NP.
I think we all need to perhaps think about taking a break from FR and perhaps the news and go to bed earlier, tackle the Christmas family visit preparations, call an old friend, pop in a DVD that’s gathering dust, etc.
Things are getting too tense.
I think if we are going to follow developments, we should maybe stick to the more trusted people out there who put out hopeful analysis. For me anyway, that’s X22, Praying Medic, Wictor, and Redpill78. Let them do some of the screening of these Tweets instead of jumping on them and worrying about what they mean.
I don’t know if someone from the Q team is reaching out, through some sort of helper anon type/emissary, to any of the people who have shows on the web to say “Look over here, not over there” or not, but if they are, which people would they focus their efforts on?
Answer that question and you know who to watch.
(These people may not even know they are dealing with a Q emissary. They might just think they found a smart person to bounce ideas off.)