Posted on 12/18/2020 12:00:19 AM PST by ransomnote
Good info, thank you for posting.
they could be in us marshals care-witness protection in a safe house somewhere..do they want another epstein?
Interesting stuff. Who knows? If such things exist, now might be the time for them to be made public.
I hear ya though, I jump every time I get an amber alert.
She didn’t want to see her complicit daughter jailed.
Now all they have to do is avoid Arkencide and Fort Marcy Park!!
I should have read further before asking my question. But no license number is eight characters (nine with the space).
Would Barr even tell us if there was CIA involvement? I’m still not sure what to make of Barr. Maybe Barr slow walking things is a head fake. We should know one way or the other, soon.
🇺🇸
Maxine Waters got her Covid vaccine today!!🤣 pic.twitter.com/MEd8AgH1YO— Dr. Infidel Angela PhD🇺🇸 (@InfidelAngela) December 19, 2020
Word parsing:
CIA doesn’t have to spy within CONUS—They have their buddies in 5 eyes do it for them. And FBI did spy—then they had to fake data to get a FISA to cover their behinds.
CIA did not spy doesn’t equal no spying by anyone.
Interesting that it says 1776. I guess it’s probably the street number, but it makes you go hmmmm. Lexington & Concord.
Add to that the ‘company’ sent Comey + Strzok intel showing that the (real) Russians were on to Hillary’s fraud op ... the (real) Russians were concerned that Hillary was setting them up as a fall guy for her fake “collusion” smear and, on top of that, the (real) Russians might try to inject something into the fake smear that was being concocted (as told to Hussein by Brennan anyway)
I saw that article earlier and thought the title “resist” was bogus - better would have been “deny”, “obstruct”, “refuse”, etc., etc..
It really is starting to look that way. Roberts is definitely compromised and it’s starting to look like the 3 new justices might be compromised, or were crooked all along. I would suggest that maybe the three new justices are cooperating with white hats and have, for some reason, been instructed to play along with the stalling tactics, -except for the fact that I can’t imagine what that reason might be.
“How many black eyes have you had in your life?”
Four for me, in my 50’s! Do I get a puhrize??
ransomnote~
ransomnote: If Barr admitted the CIA spied, he would have to say something to address why we didn’t see perp walks. Barr would have to say something like, “I couldn’t move against the pervasive infiltration while America was still asleep; 70% of the gov was bought out by enemies.”
“We had no borders; we had two “private” sovereign Chinese ports; Chinese/UN/other enemies on north and south borders; our military was gutted in terms of morale, infiltration, obsolete hardware and made with intentionally inferior steel ...from China.”
“We would fail to defend ourselves when the Cabal made its move if we didn’t delay while we awakened the public, restored America’s defenses and eroded the battle readiness of our enemies.”
Had Barr said the CIA spied = Barr either has to lay down all cards or say that the rule of law didn’t matter to anyone, including the DOJ.
But note that Barr says the Russia hoax was politicized - he can say that because he publicly ended it.
The NYT is working hard to frame Barr so that he has to choose between “CIA did no wrong”, which will be easily refuted later with Durham et. al., or “CIA spied and rule of law is not functioning now, unless it’s to protect certain people”.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The timing is interesting - the New York times “needed” to use Barr’s resignation “somehow.”
Barr’s answer will be used to portray him to conservatives as protecting the CIA, while telling the left that Trump and other’s (Admiral Rogers) assertions of spying were lies.
NYT and the rest of the Deep State media need Barr to be viewed as Deep State, so that when they try to flip the US to the Dark Side (coup, all black hats are declared white hats etc.), Barr’s knowledge of the Mueller Coup is invalidated, elevating Mueller, the Mueller Report’s claim that Trump committed treason, RR, Weisman, Strzok - all to “persecuted white hat status”.
So the NYT will now fan the “Barr is Deep State” pysop, but they had to trade something for that strategy. By answering as he did, Barr created a problem for the NYT because he underscored that Mueller’s investigation was a coup attempt.
I imagine the left will delete/erase the part of that interview it didn’t like, and all the world will hear is “Trump never had any evidence! He lied! etc.”
I didn’t read past the paywall, but I’m curious what else lurks there.
IATFH
In after the five hundred
Waiting for Qodot
What are you insinuating?
That we’ve come to the wrong place?
He should be here.
He didn’t say for sure he’d come.
- And if he doesn’t come?
- We’ll come back tomorrow.
And then the day after tomorrow.
- Possibly.
- And so on.
- The point is?
- Until he comes.
You’re merciless.
I suspected that, and have written about it. Many other nations have a vested interested in making sure the USA doesn’t fall to communism. Even if they don’t like Trump, they can’t afford to have the USA become a threat to them, or let the world fall out of balance. “Wouldn’t be prudent”
*******************************************************************************
Good Point. Plus there are bound to be people in various countries who don’t want to be part of the Totalitarian New World Order. Anti-globalists under cover.
us
and Them?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.