Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CheshireTheCat

You may be right, but it seems to me that we presume it will shock the world because any arrest that triggers a mass pop awakening has got to be big enough that the powers that be can’t hide it, cover it up, ignore it, debunk it etc. It’s got to be at least as shocking as the blue dress. The blue dress was the moment the media could no longer cover for the toon.


486 posted on 12/13/2020 9:47:34 AM PST by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]


To: ichabod1

Q said the first unsealed indictment will “trigger mass pop awakening” and the first arrest will “verify action and confirm future direction.”

A Biden, Bill Gates, or even a Fauci arrest would be ballsy and shocking. Anything ballsy and shocking would, one would think, trigger “mass pop awakening.” But would it really? Or would the media spin it as a case of Trump being the maniacal, deranged dictator they always told people he was?

Does the public think that China is behind coronavirus? Do they think there has been election fraud that China is responsible for and that the ‘rona was used to facilitate this fraud?

What percentage of the population believes this to be true? What percentage isn’t sure, but has this lingering, uncomfortable feeling that things are not what they seem and they are being lied to and Trump isn’t the one doing the lying?

With all that is coming out about China spying, perhaps the first unsealed indictment is of CCP members, who may or may not be in the country. Perhaps the first arrest is of some politican’s senior aide who facilitated much spying or a DNC official who coordinated with the CCP to allow election fraud. This would verify that action was taken to investigate and break up the CCP election fraud ring and confirm that the direction the Q team is headed is to bring in the whole ring.

There is that small matter of the EO on foreign interference in elections that has to come to fruition very soon.

Diane Feinstein? It seems the demonrats are getting ready to throw that old bag overboard to lighten their load. She could be the subject of an unsealed indictment but not the first arrest, for she could easily be dead from the stress of the indictment before handcuffs can be slapped on her.

Her indictment would be shocking more to the DS who will have to wonder who among them has been questioned and what they gave up than to the general public. But it would start to trigger some level of awakening in some of the normies, but not necessarily a mass level—yet.

It depend on what Q means by “trigger pop awakening.” He may not mean that something happens that is so shocking that overnight millions awaken. He may simply mean that the first indictment is the start of the process of awakening in that some people who thought things were “off” will start to “get” what is going on.

In order for the fraud in this election to be made evident and for a sizable majority (70%?) of the country to believe Trump was cheated and that any unprecedented action, up to and including partial martial law, Trump takes is warranted, a lot is going to have to come out in the next few weeks. This requires the unraveling of several sealed indictments and several arrests.

I don’t know that it is worth getting hung up on the very first of these indictments and arrests, for I think they have to inevitably be followed in rather swift succession by more.

We will soon see. If the arrest does not occur on the 17th or soon thereafter, it has to occur before Jan. 6, I would think, to help Trump’s case against the election fraud, including the fraud to occur in the GA senate runoff.

It could be that the first indictment and arrest is designed to trigger a reaction among the derps more than in the general population. Perhaps the first indictment and or arrest is designed to give backbone to Republican Congressman to do the right thing when it comes to certifying the results of the Electoral College.

The Trump Justice Dept. probably has a number of people ready to unseal indictments against and arrest. But which person or set of persons is most tied to the Chinese involvement with election fraud? Whose arrest will influence the SC or Congress the most? The arrest of a demonrat politician that the SC or Congress will fear the media paints Trump as having had arrested out of retaliation? Or the arrest of actual Chinese, whom the public might be suspicious of already?

I’m not so sure an arrest of someone like Biden is going to end up being so unbelievably shocking, for when it actually occurs, people may have seen it coming in that others around him will have already been arrested. It may be shocking only insofar as no American politician on that level has ever been arrested before.

It’s nice to fantasize about a Biden, Gates, or Soros being the first arrested, but is this really realistic?


699 posted on 12/13/2020 3:02:38 PM PST by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson