I see two things ... first the numbers overwhelmed the limitations they configured; they didn’t want the numbers to appear so out of whack & try to stay in 1% range so as to eliminate statewide recounts ... this then caused ratio distributions to be repeated in ways that more readily exposed the algorithm in play. second the disparity was so great they had to make the huge ballot dumps to overcome the disparity. Complete & total fraud.
Pre-Festival Request
The next thread is almost ready.
I'm guessing that the "slide/no slide" is more fun to participants than it seems like to spectators.
I request that "slide/no slide" comments remain behind when we make the jump to the new thread.
With non-participants gone, I'm confident "slide/no slide" comments will roam the terrain freely, making burrows, producing offspring and terraforming as they grow (but keep them outta the grain bins, you don't want them in there!)
ThankQ
Another part of the repeated ratios, quoted,
“the software takes the first available precinct from an
ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.”
