Let’s see if this guy seriously has the inside goods.
So much of his stuff is just wrong.
Let’s see if this guy seriously has the inside goods.
So much of his stuff is just wrong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I believe BDA is disinfo and noticed CIA fren didn’t know how to spell Martial Law (spelled it Marshal) so I don’t consider him “real” either. Sometimes the black hats release scraps of the truth through their disinfo hubs, when they have access to it, to give their disinfo sources veracity (people will believe them).
For example, both black hats and white hats could have knowledge of the blast that collapsed the mountain in NK. So even a black hat would know or have some info to dangle to claim “inside source”.
For me, the question with anonymous sources is usually, “what color hat was the ‘inside source’ wearing at the time?” With BDA, I ended up wondering who writes his stuff.
One week, where I and others (twitter) were criticizing BDA, that character tried to shore up his reputation by having a Q/A with other posters asking him probing questions calculated to provide him a platform from which to address the criticism (refute the criticism he was getting). It was so odd, some on the board said (paraphrasing), “Oh man, he brought his own fluffers with him this time.”
That to me was confirmation that someone writes that character (Surber, most likely). BDA always claims he doesn’t care whether he’s believed or not, and that he’s busy saving the world (he and his BEAUTIFUL MOSSAD wife take turns saving each other’s lives).
He could search own name on Google to see if anyone else has mentioned him to evaluate his internet reputation. But when would “BDA” have time to check out what people are saying about him on the Internet? Why would he bother? I think “someone” searched for negative comments about BDA in the far flung corners of the internet, arranged the Q/A session to shore up his reputation.
Welp - that sounded to me like Surber (sp) or some other handler for that image writes BDA. I’d seen that tactic before - does anyone else remember Ulsterman? Journalist claimed to have reports from Ulsterman (insider info) but was writing the content himself?
While black hats can have information, I’ve never gotten a clue as to what kinds of information they will share to get a reputation for being “right”. Frustrating, but sometimes I still hope for scraps but then if I find them, I don’t’ trust them...but then why did I look? :/
How are we ever going to get used to NOT having Q post The Storm (you know, normal living)? We’ll be glaring at future leaders, wondering why they posted an image of canary in their Twitter account (comms? COMMS!) and how come they capitalized some words and not others.
I’m afraid we may become crumb addicts....roaming the back allies, looking for people who “know stuff” n things and will leak it. If it’s been too long and we NEED to know, some will be willing to dig through piles of disinfo for us because there’s gotta be SOME truth in there. And we’ll want to know what they found...
We’re gonna need ‘12-step’ groups to kick the crumb habit, but once we ‘connect the dots’, we’ll have to bump it up to ‘17-step’ protocol....*time for sleep - my sense of humor has dozed off*