Replies

Let’s see if this guy seriously has the inside goods.
So much of his stuff is just wrong.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I believe BDA is disinfo and noticed CIA fren didn’t know how to spell Martial Law (spelled it Marshal) so I don’t consider him “real” either. Sometimes the black hats release scraps of the truth through their disinfo hubs, when they have access to it, to give their disinfo sources veracity (people will believe them).

For example, both black hats and white hats could have knowledge of the blast that collapsed the mountain in NK. So even a black hat would know or have some info to dangle to claim “inside source”.

For me, the question with anonymous sources is usually, “what color hat was the ‘inside source’ wearing at the time?” With BDA, I ended up wondering who writes his stuff.

One week, where I and others (twitter) were criticizing BDA, that character tried to shore up his reputation by having a Q/A with other posters asking him probing questions calculated to provide him a platform from which to address the criticism (refute the criticism he was getting). It was so odd, some on the board said (paraphrasing), “Oh man, he brought his own fluffers with him this time.”

That to me was confirmation that someone writes that character (Surber, most likely). BDA always claims he doesn’t care whether he’s believed or not, and that he’s busy saving the world (he and his BEAUTIFUL MOSSAD wife take turns saving each other’s lives).

He could search own name on Google to see if anyone else has mentioned him to evaluate his internet reputation. But when would “BDA” have time to check out what people are saying about him on the Internet? Why would he bother? I think “someone” searched for negative comments about BDA in the far flung corners of the internet, arranged the Q/A session to shore up his reputation.

Welp - that sounded to me like Surber (sp) or some other handler for that image writes BDA. I’d seen that tactic before - does anyone else remember Ulsterman? Journalist claimed to have reports from Ulsterman (insider info) but was writing the content himself?

While black hats can have information, I’ve never gotten a clue as to what kinds of information they will share to get a reputation for being “right”. Frustrating, but sometimes I still hope for scraps but then if I find them, I don’t’ trust them...but then why did I look? :/

How are we ever going to get used to NOT having Q post The Storm (you know, normal living)? We’ll be glaring at future leaders, wondering why they posted an image of canary in their Twitter account (comms? COMMS!) and how come they capitalized some words and not others.

I’m afraid we may become crumb addicts....roaming the back allies, looking for people who “know stuff” n things and will leak it. If it’s been too long and we NEED to know, some will be willing to dig through piles of disinfo for us because there’s gotta be SOME truth in there. And we’ll want to know what they found...

We’re gonna need ‘12-step’ groups to kick the crumb habit, but once we ‘connect the dots’, we’ll have to bump it up to ‘17-step’ protocol....*time for sleep - my sense of humor has dozed off*

There is an interesting take on the Hal stuff and Chinese troops stuff on Uncle Sam's Misguided Children - Canadian Defence Department Confirms Chinese PLA Were Observing Military Exercises

A good article and here are a few highlights that caught my attention:

"But was China only sending innocent observers, or were they sending spies? Spies is a logical answer. And Trudeau played right into their hands. Were these innocent “observations” by the Chinese military or were they involved in actual “training.” Knowing that China has designs on world domination, it is highly unlikely that they were just casually “observing.”"

"When Ezra Levant, the Founder of Rebel News, sent a public records request to the Canadian government, he received unredacted documents back by mistake. Those documents revealed a “relationship” with the Chinese PLA that may not have been advantageous to Canada, but was certainly a gift of information for China."

He also links to Ezra Levant who was on with Tucker https://www.rebelnews.com/the_china_files/the_china_files and explains how they accidentally received unredacted documents and has copies of them. Very interesting if you seen the Tucker piece on it.

This peaked my interest regarding the Hal incident in the Military Opinion Section:

Ominous? Navy, Marines, Air Force, Army on the Move.
It goes on to say that it is not so ominous (of course we always have training to do) and says the following:

((my note: why "21"?))

"The training exercise called Steel Knight/Dawn Blitz 21 is occurring off the coast of California. The fact that these are not normal times hasn’t been lost on the people watching for these serious issues. But training together is an absolute necessity, ESPECIALLY in times like these. With the division in the US and a hotly contested election, it’s only “normal” that our military should train to kick some butt if/when necessary."

"Where Mr Turner veered from reality is when he stated that
1) China and Russia could invade the US, (which would be a mistake of enormous proportions), and
2) that the Democrats were planning to ask the UN to invade and depose President Trump, or
3) that certain states would likely secede from the union because you know, ‘orange man bad’, and be forcibly brought back. While we’re sure that some Democrats would love to see that, the UN has no jurisdiction in the United States. Violating that would get them evicted from their cushy digs here."

"He mentioned that the Chinese military is “positioning itself.” They’ve been doing that for decades. Forever. Constantly. They want world domination. They want Taiwan back and have been “saber-rattling” about that now for their own military exercises. If they do it, there goes another major conflict that would ensue. I’m sure Biden could handle it from the basement. But invade the United States? I think there was a Japanese general in WWII who mentioned something about that not being a smart move.

------------------

--->> My footnote to this, however true much of it is, is that the writer/publication greatly under emphasizes the true state of OUR nation, the U.S., the entrenchment of CCP in ALL aspects of our governments (state, local, federal), and the dire predicament we are in overall regardless.

The fact that our very national sovereignty and national security is threatened by so many things, including the entire democrat-china party and parts of the china-GOP, cannot be underscored enough!