Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Can anyone think of a reason why POTUS might have deliberately held back the Durham indictments? Assuming that Barr and Durham have not gone rogue, what good reason would there be to not have released indictments yet? Did POTUS not want anything to distract the public’s attention from the voter fraud? Would releasing indictments prior to the election have given the enemy a way to deflect public attention away from their voter fraud and onto the ‘Trump’s politicizing of the DOJ in order win reelection’ narrative? I have no idea.


503 posted on 12/08/2020 10:37:59 PM PST by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies ]


To: mbrfl

“ Can anyone think of a reason why POTUS might have deliberately held back the Durham indictments? ”

I don’t think that’s POTUS’s call.


505 posted on 12/08/2020 10:41:02 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: mbrfl

> Can anyone think of a reason why POTUS might have deliberately held back the Durham indictments?

My best guess has already been posted. That is basically that before this change in status Durhan could only bring people to trial in CT, since he is US Attorney for CT. Now that he has special prosecutor status he can do that shiite anywhere he wants to.

That’s super important.

It could also mean that the grand juries are done and he’s ready for show time.

-SB


510 posted on 12/08/2020 10:49:16 PM PST by Snowybear ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: mbrfl

I am sure that Trump did not deliberately hold back Durham. Durham does his thing and he would not be influenced by political anythings. Durham was delayed according to Barr, by covid slowing down grand juries.

Now that Durham has been appointed SC for election fraud, that likely means he’s finished with his investigations, someone smarter than me pointed it out. That as Fed attoreny for Connecticut he could only prosecute crimes committed in Ct. Being SC, he can prosecute any crimes, so now the prosectutions can go forward and the investigations are wound up.

I am paraprashing. The idea that Barr and/or Durham has gone rogue has no foundation in any fact. Barr said int he spring that he expected Durham indictments by the end of summer, and his recent statement or recently released statement said that.


522 posted on 12/08/2020 11:03:36 PM PST by little jeremiah (Thirst for truth is the most valuable possession and no one can take it away from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: mbrfl

I think “The Storm” is a confluence of a whole bunch of things hitting at once/the same week: favorable SC decision, sealed indictments being released, use of EBS to air the video of demonrat crimes the mainstream press won’t air, suicides of notable people, devastating put down of Antifa, exposure of the plandemic, and things that I and perhaps no one but Q has thought of.

The fraud was allowed to happen to bring us to the brink and to show not only us, but the world, how f*cked up the election system is, for people in other countries need to doubt if their leaders were rightfully elected.

Who knows how far-reaching these indictments will go in terms of them extending to citizens of other countries, thus opening the door up for those citizens to demand their leaders be forced from office and extradited
or perhaps given the lamppost treatment.

I think right now even about 20% of the people who voted for Biden are hoping Trump gets a 2nd term.


525 posted on 12/08/2020 11:06:38 PM PST by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson