Click on the above image to read author Martin Geddes' excellent
article explaining the role Q plays in President Trump's Plan
Part of our thread's resource table is shown below. We've collected links to videos, Q drops, analysts, memes, archives etc. which we find most useful. The table will be expanding to include hearing transcripts and content specific to key players (Obama, Clinton, etc.).
Welcome to our Q thread.
It's impossible to learn about Trump's successes and strategies by following the MSM.
Much preparation has gone into the strategy now unfolding in D.C. The groundwork has been laid and the path to justice is almost cleared of barriers.
By learning all we can, we are supporting President Trump's vision for our country.
MAGA!
Our prior Q thread is here:
Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 12/06/20
(h/t FReeQ whose name I forgot! Ack!) ~~~~~
I respectfully request any who wish to continue the discussion which little Jeremiah references in post 1,963 limit that content to Festival. ThankQ
Father in Heaven, lead us to move beyond prayer to stand for truth, strengthen us and steel our will to resist fear, temptation and intimidation tactics.
I ask these things in Jesus' name, Amen.
How To Put On The Armor of God
Here is Stars & Stripes link to the AMERICA Prayer Vigil - December 6, 2020 (Prayer)
ThankQ
Please Quote Post To Which You Are Replying
Please help our thread skip right along by including (quoting) an excerpt of the post to which you are replying. Please click here for details. ThankQ.
Please Use Graphic Content Warnings
When posting disturbing content, please type GRAPHIC CONTENT in the first line of your post. If possible, provide the general context in a few words.Please click here for more information. ThankQ
All 8ch links and link variations are prohibited
The board owner specifically prohibits the posting of 8ch links, and all variations of 8ch links (e.g., broken links, images, etc.). Please click here for details. ThankQ
Thanks RN - in before the next round of apologies.
WW G1WGA
Prayers for POTUS and the USA.
Came back in from bow hunting (no luck) to find a new Q thread. ThankQ Ransomnote.
Now I gotta go back to read the festival posts.
Did I make it???
Thanks, MQD
In! the front row of this epic saga. What a show. ThankQ MQD and all the amazing FreeQ’s.
It seems to me there are some interesting legal issues involved in the new SCOTUS case. It seems clear that Texas has standing, as the outcome of these states’ elections effects the citizens of Texas.
It should be easy enough to prove that these states violated Article II Section I Clause II of the Constitution when the state courts, using court orders, imposed de facto changes to election law without the approval of the state legislatures. But no court likes to take up a case unless the violation being cited can be shown to have effected the outcome. If some Constitutional violation could be shown to have occurred but it only occurred in one small precinct, SCOTUS would almost never take the case, because it could likely be shown that the violation didn’t effect the final outcome.
So Paxon needs to show not just violation of the Constitution, but needs to prove that the violation likely changed the outcome. Since they’re arguing this on Constitutional grounds, it’s unclear to me the degree to which they can use evidence of fraud to make their case. For example, Dominion vote switching effected the outcome, but the vote switching is a criminal violation of the law, not a violation of Article II Section I Clause II. It seems to me that they would have to prove that Constitutional violations alone (i.e. Court orders that allowed late ballots to be accepted, signature validations to be waived, etc.) changed the outcome of the election. Should still be easy enough to prove, I would imagine,
but the argument will be a little less straight forward than it would be if the broader issues of voter fraud, voter intimidation, etc. were allowed to be presented. That’s my take anyway. I’m not a lawyer.
ThanQ for the new thread. the last thread was pretty decent, even with the rabble-rousers.
Remember, VP Pence breaks all ties until 01/20/2021 @ noon.
So let’s keep our eyes on the prize and drag the repubs over the GA Senate finish line.
Then... Let’s Finish This!
Wooh Hoo, New Q, Too.
Durham?
In!!!!!!!!!
In B 4 two hundred! 😁
Thank Q Most Awesome Q Mod!
🌸🌼🌺
I’m in, with a thanks to RN as always.
Now, I must return to festival to finish up!
Know your Nautical terminology
In maneuvering the ship, the connning officer issues helm commands in a prescribed form. It is the duty of the helmsman to repeat back the order and then carry out the command EXACTLY as ordered. It is essential that there can be NO misunderstanding of orders to the helm or lee-helm.
Helm commands
Helm commands are generally given in three parts
Direction: Either left, right or “Rudder amidships”
Amount: Expressed as a number of degrees of rudder (10, 15, etc.), or one of the following: (nominal values given)
Standard: 15°
Full: 30°
Hard: 35°(maximum rudder angle)
Course: >10 degree change
Example: "Right standard rudder come to new course 150"
When deciding how much rudder to use the conning officer must consider the speed of the ship. The general rule is that speed + rudder angle should NOT exceed 25 unless necessary.
Consider this clip from the movie Greyhound. It demonstrates proper orders to the helm and the effects of those orders.
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
In, finally, and thanks!
Ever notice that people using umbrellas always seem to be under the weather?
Cool new thread!
Here. Thanks for the new thread.
ThankQ dear FRiend...public opinion is important and knowledge is power...keep the faith stay strong and God bless all Patriots... 👍🇺🇸🙏
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸ThanQ, MQD!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
TXnMA