Posted on 12/02/2020 11:31:02 AM PST by doug from upland
They have Biden at 306. 37 electoral votes need to be changed to make a 269-269 tie and it goes to the delegation of states for the vote in which Trump would prevail. You can do the math. Here is the map.
Need 3, it looks like.
AZ + WI + MI (or GA).
You don’t want it to 269. You want a cushion. Drop it below 260.
When is it going to the Supreme Court?
I will not comply with a #votefraudpresident. It’s war. KTF
No math necessary, support the truth of a President Trump land-slide or give a Mr Biden fraud-slide a free pass.
Many are just being polite and patient as we wait for the legislatures to catch-up with the facts and evidence before electoral votes are taken, and if they have to, the courts to do the right thing.
You don’t get to cheat and then get the spoils of a Presidential election and I’m pretty sure a lot of Americans are going to be more adamant about this as even more evidence is revealed.
Need to flip GA and PA, then any other and he has enough to win .
The hard way....
We need PA, Ga, and then either Nevada or Arizona.
Georgia certainly will be a poop show for a week or two.
I dont see much coming from Michigan honestly.
(I didnt realize it but Michigan and Georgia and have the same number of e-votes.
It isn't.
Trump doesn’t need to win any of those states, only deny them to Biden. Get Joe under 270 and Congress decides the election. Spoiler Alert: They will cuck out and elect Joe anyway.
Why not?
In 2000, the Supreme Court intervened swiftly and decisively. The present constitutional crisis is vastly greater. Where are they?
If it’s 306 for Biden, it looks like any three of the five, AZ, GA, MI, PA, WI not being able to cast electoral votes brings it to House contingency vote.
If it were PA and either GA or MI that would be 36 and not enough by one electoral vote.
So it looks like any three of the five not able to cast electoral votes does not give Biden a majority.
Yes, they intervened where they had no business going, disregarded the intricate and precise Constitutional mechanism that had been created by men much wiser than they to deal with the situation, virtually destroyed the doctrine of nonjusticeable political questions, and changed the outcome not at all.
Political question.
NOPE!
Strictly a Constitutional issue - "equal treatment" among others.
It will be going there, win/lose another story
How about plugs concedes and we won’t execute the fraudsters? That should sound like a great deal for them.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.