Perhaps. I’m not doubting what has happened over many years and in many countries beyond our shores in addition to during our own country, but this argument has to convince State Legislatures and/or the Judiciary to overturn the current results of this contest. And it has to be specific, to wit: This event, directed by this version of the software installed on this machine on this day and time, modified the legitimate result from this to this ending with an invalid final result in this State.
The current argument does not do this. It can be invaluable when the time comes to demand election reform to ensure that this never happens again. Two different objectives, two different strategies and two different outcomes, reelect Trump, and stamp out this blatant cheating for future elections. It’s not hard to understand.
reelect Trump, and stamp out this blatant cheating for future elections. It’s not hard to understand.
Count me in, bro. You in ?
Perhaps. I’m not doubting what has happened over many years and in many countries beyond our shores in addition to during our own country, but this argument has to convince State Legislatures and/or the Judiciary to overturn the current results of this contest. And it has to be specific, to wit: This event, directed by this version of the software installed on this machine on this day and time, modified the legitimate result from this to this ending with an invalid final result in this State.
The current argument does not do this. It can be invaluable when the time comes to demand election reform to ensure that this never happens again. Two different objectives, two different strategies and two different outcomes, reelect Trump, and stamp out this blatant cheating for future elections. It’s not hard to understand.
*********
Tell it to the lawyers on Trump’s team handling the cases and courts.
We don’t do that.
All we’re doing is researching info for our own understanding.
We are not in control or command of anything.
You accuse us of wasting Trump’s time. How? We have no say in what Trump does or does not do.
We research for our own understanding.
And you and your kind give us grief for it. And you’re doing exactly what? What super special extraordinary thing are you doing? Getting ready for the war to come, maybe? Like many of us are as well?
What should we be doing right now instead of researching for info on what’s happening and why?
That is all the Q thing is about.
That is it.
That is all.
Q doesn’t tell us what to do or when to do it.
We are not bound down and unable to act unless Q commands, demands, or permits.
Q just gives us pointers on where to look and some help on connecting the dots.
That is all.
And you come in here and give us grief for it.
Like a troll.
Or a paid shill.
So, when we call you out as exactly what you behave as, don’t pretend to be so surprised.
Oh, and I really enjoy reading y’alls comments where you’re so damn sure you know every detail of how this is all going to fail, and everyone involved in trying to defend the Republic and its elections from tyrants and thieves are all idiots.
Just like the msm has indoctrinated you to believe for so long.
Semper Fidelis, Mac.
You’re trolling again.
If there is sufficient evidence of foreign powers actively interfering or adulterating the voting process itself, then the courts then play second fiddle to the military.
Or didn’t you notice the part about executions by the DOJ by means which haven’t been used lately?
Or the part about the head of the organization which secures nuclear warheads being replaced?
That’s a place where Dominion would come in which doesn’t have anything to do with the courts.
= = = = = = =
And you’re wrong about the courts too.
These are CIVIL cases, so that standard is NOT “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” but “preponderance of the evidence” (51%-49%, wins).
And it doesn’t have to be “these votes were definitely changed” but “ENOUGH votes...MIGHT have been changed” not to overturn the election — but just to hold it in abeyance until some serious digging can be done.
The Dems’ game is to lie, obfuscate, stall, and delay, long enough that a President cannot be selected by the ordinary time; in which case the current Speaker of the House assumes the role of President.
Pelosi more or less said so “many arrows in our quiver” ...WEEKS ago.
And it has to be specific, to wit: This event, directed by this version of the software installed on this machine on this day and time, modified the legitimate result from this to this ending with an invalid final result in this State.
———————————————————
I am herewith returning the stipulation to dismiss in the above entitled matter; the same being duly executed by me.