Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[2019] House passes sweeping Democrat-backed election security bill
The Hill ^ | 6/27/2019 | Maggie Miller and Juliegrace Brufke

Posted on 11/27/2020 12:38:56 PM PST by Eagle Forgotten

The House passed a Democrat-backed bill that would require election systems to use voter-verified paper ballots as an attempt to avoid election interference by a party-line vote of 225-184 on Tuesday, with only one Republican voting in favor.

The Securing America’s Federal Elections (SAFE) Act — spearheaded by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) — would authorize $600 million for the Election Assistance Commission, which would be allocated to states to enhance their security ahead of 2020 and includes language that would ban voting machines from being connected to the internet and being produced in foreign countries.

. . . .

“I want to highlight the fact that there's no evidence of voting machines being hacked in 2016, 2018 or ever,” [Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.)] added. “So why are we forcing states to get rid of what they deem the safe technology? We should work together to safeguard technology, not abandon it.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: 2019; elections; evm; flashback; machines; oldnews
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
This article is from 2019. Back then, it was the Dems who recognized the dangers of electronic voting machines (EVMs). If the bill had become law, it would have prevented some (of course not all) of the problems that Sidney Powell highlighted in her latest filings.

The irony is that the bill never became law because Mitch McConnell didn't even let it come to a vote. The GOPe was completely okay with hackable EVMs as long as they were confident that the beneficiaries of vote rigging would all be Republicans.

For 2021: Will a bill like this now pass the Senate, only to be buried by Pelosi? Could happen.

1 posted on 11/27/2020 12:38:56 PM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

Maybe this bill was passed by the Liberals as a cover for what they knew was going to happen.


2 posted on 11/27/2020 12:41:20 PM PST by billyboy15 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten
I'm sure the dems knew it wouldn't fly.

To be honest -> I'm sure there are plenty of Republicans guilty of all this stuff too. Who knows - maybe Kemp won this way? Maybe Stacey made a deal - couldn't prove it but they agreed this election was her turn to control the knobs.

I'm not saying that's TRUE ... just that the fact that it's entirely plausible means that -> YES dem policy will destroy the country, but that doesn't mean much of the Republican party is not disgusting and corrupt too.

3 posted on 11/27/2020 12:45:17 PM PST by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

The bill has to have some security-undermining features hidden somewhere in the fine print, for the Democrats to have passed it.


4 posted on 11/27/2020 12:46:25 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

Yep let the democrats use it and the ban it so it can’t be used against them.


5 posted on 11/27/2020 12:51:52 PM PST by glimmerman70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

Democrats have been the election-fraud party since at least 1960. If they were for the 2019 bill, it was a scam.

“Voter-verified paper ballots” do not equal security. This is what they used in CA in 2020, when the State mailed unsolicited ballots for every registration, no matter how out-of-date or duplicate. The ballots were easily harvested.


6 posted on 11/27/2020 12:54:23 PM PST by UnwashedPeasant (Trump is solving the world's problems only to distract us from Russia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell
I haven't read the bill. Note, however, that the stated Republican objection wasn't to something in the fine print. It was, instead, to pooh-pooh the whole idea that voting machines might be hacked.
7 posted on 11/27/2020 12:54:31 PM PST by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

I’m glad that they voted for using paper ballots.

However, what is in the legislation that prevented Republicans from voting in favour?


8 posted on 11/27/2020 12:55:34 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is thp at they are both death cults. N)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell

The Dominion system uses paper ballots, doesn’t it? Wondering if this legislation would have pushed the states into adopting the Dominion systems.


9 posted on 11/27/2020 12:56:09 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

What does the bill say beyond the first paragraph? I trust nothing coming from democraps. No doubt it had voting for Guatemalans and banning signature and/or ID checking.

I’ve never liked voting machines. I’m OK with hand filled ballots and tabulator boxes like they use in NM where you keep the original ballots in case of recounts, but I’ve seen it myself where the stupid computerized machines will be at least defective and try to register the wrong vote. And do you really trust or know whether it’s actually tabulating the vote you selected? An ink and paper hand-filled ballot is visible and obvious to the voter.


10 posted on 11/27/2020 1:00:55 PM PST by Mr. Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

This has been mentioned a number of times, with the comments being that other provisions within it would have mandated compromise of the election systems nation-wide, instead of just the states that did it to themselves.


11 posted on 11/27/2020 1:06:07 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

I do not trust any “Election Assistance Commission.” On the face of it, a swipe at the common citizen deemed incapable of voting and counting. This commission is in need of investigation, and most likely dismemberment. Who are these people? What are their convictions?


12 posted on 11/27/2020 1:11:23 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (I'd rather have a rude President than a polite tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Is this the bill that allowed ballot harvesting everywhere?


13 posted on 11/27/2020 1:29:28 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

The ProgsDems always play the long game. It may be a perfectly honest bill. But the Dems goal is to federalize elections. Once the fed controls elections then the elections will be run by those who control the Fed i.e. Democrats.

Once the Dems control the election they can then go full Banana Republic.


14 posted on 11/27/2020 1:33:32 PM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell

If memory serves me, (and I admit that it’s not what it once was) the GOP rejected the election security bill because it did not address voter I.D., had mandatory mail-in (permanent) and nationwide ballot harvesting. As with everything cooked up by the Demon rats, it was anything BUT the title of the bill.


15 posted on 11/27/2020 1:42:57 PM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell

Exactly.

And the facts that nearly every House Republican voted against it and that the Senate Majority Leader would not let it come up for a vote are telltale signs that the details smelled to high heaven.


16 posted on 11/27/2020 1:50:31 PM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Lol the fox changed the locks on the henhouse


17 posted on 11/27/2020 1:52:44 PM PST by jneesy (I want my country back and Trump is gonna give it to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

That will go nowhere in Senate!!


18 posted on 11/27/2020 2:06:34 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

The U.S. Constitution already has it covered. If States can’t certify their elections due to unlawful elections, including recent Federal law of internet use, then they lose representation in the Electoral College. Period. .


19 posted on 11/27/2020 2:26:31 PM PST by RideForever (We were born to be tested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Forgotten

Interesting.

Twelve and Fourteenth amendments. Signing of those two EOs back in 2018.

13849 or six, not sure.

We live in interesting times.

5.56mm


20 posted on 11/27/2020 2:30:12 PM PST by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! Finish THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson