[SaxxonWoods]

“Make no mistake, they will not concede on Election Night.
Make no mistake, they will contest this legally in battleground states.
Make no mistake, they will project doubt in the election results
Make no mistake, they will organize massive riots and attempt Anarchy-99 design
Playbook known.
Q”

Q predicted a Democrat defeat.
Said they would project doubt on the results. No, they have said to abide by the results because the “results” show they won.

Q had a total miss on the election.

[meyer]

Q had a total miss on the election.

I have to disagree - yeah, the left is pretending that they won, and haven't conceded. And yes, they will contest this, but not from the standing of being right - they'll try to stop Trump from stopping the steal.

And yeah, they are projecting doubts in the election process, though it is our guys that are doing the contesting and such. But they left a trail of MASSIVE fraud to achieve the false win.

Their win will be overturned because it is fraudulent. And once that happens, expect the riots to churn up. Which will be met with (hopefully) authorities. Otherwise, we patriots will declare open season on Antifa/BLM/commies.

[Snowybear]

> Q had a total miss on the election. I agree and have stated this before. -SB

[CheshireTheCat]

“Q had a total miss on the election.”

What Q posted on 9.16 could have been disinformation designed to make the DS think Q was not onto all the various mechanics of how they were going to commit election fraud.

—Or Q came into some knowledge after that date that allowed the team to put more stings in place to capture irrefutable proof of election fraud, such a high degree of proof that many involved will have to turn state’s witness to avoid a dire fate.

[Keflavik76]

Q had a total miss on the election.
----------------------------------------------
It's difficult to believe that the white hats didn't know the big election cheat was coming. As late as 24 Sept 2020 Q posted that:

The 'Election Infection' cannot stop what is coming.

And just why did Q post a lone "Durham" on 13 Nov 2020 in the middle of election chaos? That just nags my mind.
And then there is this Chain of Custody reference indicating that Barr and Durham might be buds and got a lot of bad boys on the hook.

DECLAS CoC
POTUS > Barr
Barr > Durham
[[F] classified intel provided [FVEY - Non FVEY] as needed]
Does Durham want to hold [freeze] 'public' declas due to criminal nature of the probe(s)?
Think GJ material.

[lyby]

The repeated use by Q of “they” in shared quote...

Once again, the use of pronouns without first clarifying can cause confusion.

Perhaps,
~ President Trump and like-minded candidates will not concede on Election Night;
~ President Trump, like-minded candidates, and Patriots will contest this (rampant election fraud) legally;
~ The MSM, YT, Tw@tter, FB, etc., will project doubt in the election results;
~ The communists, facsists, blm, antifa, et.al., will organize massive riots, etc.

Whoever “they” actually is, Q ends the post with
“PLAYBOOK KNOWN.”

President Trump won this election in a landslide.

It ain’t over.

Thanksgiving blessings

and

((hugs))

~ lyby