When is a perfect oval evidence of vote fraud?
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/when_is_a_perfect_oval_evidence_of_vote_fraud.html
The article includes a YouTube video link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLIS68YfMYU
Video w Eric Coomer, Waldeep Singh, David Marino, CEO John Poulos and other Dominion support staff.
EXCERPTS from the video:
At the 18:30 mark, David Marino states the following:
Something important, uh, on these marks that are created on the ballot is we have a huge library of handmade marks so it’s not a perfect oval that you are going to be able to identify that that was a mark by a machine. But it’s, it’s ah, it’s a library of different random hand marks that looks like somebody else used a Sharpie to vote the ballot. So you are never going to be able to say this is ah, a ballot voted by the accessible uh voter, this is a ballot voted by a person with a Sharpie for example, for, with the mark.
Dr. Coomer follows immediately with:
Yeah, again it’s all about preserving voter anonymity, um you know if, if you only have one or two disabled voters in a given precinct an if you’re using standard marking techniques where they’re, uh uh an exact perfect fill of that oval um you would be able to uh distinguish that ballot from somebody that just hand marked it. So this is one of those further steps that we do um to preserve that anonymity.
Interesting CYA for cheaters.
Even still, there should be a some random distribution of all these cute little emojis instead of an entire batch or batches of the "eclipses" described in the video and other witnesses' descriptions of perfectly filled in ovals on pristine ballots.