Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes

She was not seated in time to participate in the case.

I see no reason for you to take my post as hostile to you or for you to be hostile to me, especially if you don’t want to be nitpicky.

I am going to forget this exchange just as I did your last case of taking offense and misconstruing what I said.
You may do as you wish.


1,446 posted on 11/24/2020 5:34:50 PM PST by Farcesensitive (K is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1408 | View Replies ]


To: Farcesensitive

I have misconstrued NOTHING. As I asked you weeks ago, I wish YOU to stop posting ANYTHING to me. And yet you continue—that’s offensive.


1,450 posted on 11/24/2020 5:38:30 PM PST by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1446 | View Replies ]

To: Farcesensitive
She was not seated in time to participate in the case.

Let's put this to bed. that's just not true. the minute she was sworn in, she could have voted.
The choice to not participate in a case is hers and hers alone.
You won't see the words recuse or abstain or sick in a decision.
The statement "Justice X not participating" within the decision is a statement that covers all reasons why an Associate Justice did not participate.

FreeRegards
1,595 posted on 11/24/2020 9:04:29 PM PST by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1446 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson