One more point: It may be that there IS A PAPER TRAIL for all ChinaBiden’s votes ... it’s just that it consists of fraudulent Mail-In ballots. Maybe that is where the Trump team needs to make its stand in SCOTUS.
*************************************************************************************
Good points regarding the fraud and the SCOTUS argument. Levin was discussing the constitutional case tonight. Basically all these changes that the judges and SOS made without even consulting the legislature, are unconstitutional-they had no authority to do it.
Hence none of the expanded mail in voting should be counted and those numbers are enough to RESTORE the election to a legal and constitutional basis—a win for POTUS.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, I saw it. Excellent. I think this is the slam-dunk part of Trump's (our) case (already signaled by Alito).
The CHALLENGE is going to be showing enough votes to change the outcome in PA, MI, WI, GA, NV and perhaps others. It sounds like we don't quite get there by excluding the late votes and other unconstitutional votes, but need to also invoke the FRAUDULENT and CORRUPT practices such as excluding observers during parts of the counting, forging ballots etc.
I think that will be the main part of the TRIAL.
The 5 SCOTUS Constitutionalists are going to have to step up and make a courageous, possibly even HEROIC, decision in one of the most consequential cases in history.
I can't wait to see Sidney's case this week on Dominion/Smartmatic; however, I'm not counting on it being resolved in time to help. Then again, maybe the Justices will at least HEAR it and be influenced (just a bit) in their overall assessment of the FRAUD.