A scanner can distinguish between laser printed *fills* and Sharpie *fills* of an ellipse/oval “field.”
A program that knows the Dominion library, can also record which, among a set of ballots, have ellipse/oval *fills* from the Dominion library.
Exactly
Every ballot created by Dominion for a "disabled voter" can be scanned for the random distribution of the helpful emojis. There should be a fairly equal number of each in the results.
The lady in Detroit said she saw 100's with perfectly filled in circles/ovals. Odds of those being randomly created identically for "disabled voters" is very low.
My point being, it should be easy to identify a high percentage fraudulent machine created ballots.
In fact if I heard the presentation correctly the fact that it was machine created and which emoji was used should be in the metadata and shouldn't need a rescan.
Also... If there's more machine created ballots than is in the metadata, that should be a flag as well.