Have you noticed that only one other person here has expressed interest in reading your Lame Cherry postings?
Be nice in the room...
I actually have read the LC postings here. Information is good, even when it’s iffy...hell, we see enough of the kaboom pow GP stuff...
I like reading the Lame Cherry posts but I find them to be a bit schizophrenic. One post will strongly suggest that PDJT is on top of the fraud and will absolutely prevail. The next post seems to suggest the opposite. Is she/he just trying to cover his/her bases? I read everything and then I decide, or at least pontificate, just like Q wants us to do.
Although I messaged privately requesting a link, make that at least two people who have expressed interest in reading LC posts.
If you don't care for LC's writing, just scroll past the few paragraphs of text.
The plentiful embedded cat-wrestling videos in some posts waste far more bandwidth.
If the posting police force CB not to post LC's text, but only permit posting links, then the anti-blog zealots will harass him for blog-pumping.
After spending sufficient time on FR [or anywhere], it's reasonable & easy to assign a subjective weight to the value of a frequent poster's opinions.
I haven't seen any multiple, significant objections from anti-LC FReepers to ban LC's writing. A few other writers have been banned permanently. Lew Rockwell is one.
Have you noticed that only one other person here has expressed interest in reading your Lame Cherry postings?
**************************************
We’re in a war for the survival of the country and
you fret about a blogger you don’t like but others
find interesting. Curious.
Have you noticed that only one other person here has expressed interest in reading your Lame Cherry postings?
******************
Hadn’t noticed. Believe your statement is inaccurate.
I like the Lame Cherry spacedy puzzle posts! I like finding them here. Quite a few other posts are equal or longer in lenghth.