Posted on 11/18/2020 9:40:40 PM EST by lostmywayQ
Lame Cherry is the result of years of defeat and and self-denigration reflected in classic narcissism without sacrifice; malcontent words to spread dark confusion across the country and achieve no transformation but: further into darkness as promised by the enemy. Lame Cherry has laid ad-hominem attacks in earnest against those 'we the people' have elected in love and is no part of Q and most of anons.
In fact, as anti-Q Lame Cherry often paints terrible disgusting portraits and loosely linked facts into twisted theories in order to spread confusion in the guise of logic while co-opting the Q movement; our news. From the beginning, Lame Cherry has co-opted, mixed and mingled hundreds of the worlds worst conspiracy theories and facts; hammering out no truth. Lame Cherry was likley designed by foreign elements (grammar kitty detects) with multiple authors and has made critical thinking errors on U.S. history and policy often. Lame Cherry is of darkness, 'mind' control, heavily biased towards evil non-resoluton and the glorification/normalization of such so that you become impotent in your rationale against future events through opaqueness and death blossom thinking; an enslavement of mental chains difficult enough to break out of; a ‘group-think of darkness’. More importantly, this boundless thinking style without discipline entraps and diverts the movement as an anti-Q that provides weak (‘free thinkers’) a platform which muddles and confuses free thought, truth, and national pride.
Lame Cherry then, professing to be free, is the MOST dogmatic in it's denial of any truth and seeks to arrest the narrative and/or the stability of good women and men.
When you are 'asleep' or weak, you stand easily on the inside of the unstable anti-logic 'everything's true' collective, and have ‘chained thought’.
"Slave thought" positions are reinforced constantly by Lame Cherry, formed on the basis of illogic, fatuity, and conjectural observation.
When you are in chains, you are not able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust Lame Cherry and put hate in yourself, others, and all human endeavors.
You are alone and you are in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WOTHTH !!!" ~ LC
LC 1st post
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2007_03_10_archive.html
It is not enough to 'surf' the worlds conspiracy theories
and cherry pick portions as 'truths'
as a wrapper to manufacture a 'truth' from current events.
The examples of disconnected thinking go on and on and on... but have more important things to do.
Stay close to Q.
'Light' Examples of LC:
Oh. My.
I agree with you ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY EIGHT percent. Lame Cherry, Biggus Diqus Anon, and 'E' belong in the same underwear drawer of goofiness and fakery.
I am of the school of thought that whacko stuff like that die the death of a thousand cuts rather than be outright banned.
Mockery and debunkery should emanate from the body, so says Landru.
Now do that 'E' character. He's next up to bat.
#FakeAssWannabes
#BeCarefulWhoYouFollow
Masterful. Thanks for shining light on LC.
And this is how we lift up and enlighten each other: by sharing information without denigrating one another.
I am grateful to the both of you for your posts.
you get an A+.
Standing applause. I read some LC many years ago and came to the same conclusion in my own kindergarten-speak.
PSA: May I have Your Attention?
I'm sorry I've been off thread so much that I did not see the issue of anti-Q content emerging on thread before now.
We periodically find content that, while some FReeQs and FReepers may want to follow it, it's just not a good fit for our thread. This post is about content from Lame Cherry (LC).
I recall LC's work from a year or two ago when people would send me private pings which alternated between plausible analysis and then venomous diatribes, wildly speculative content and intensely anti-Q focus.
Personally, I think LC content is only appropriate for private email pings. I definitely recommend against creating LC forum threads.
We have more than we know; let's focus on Q.
I request that LC content not be posted to the Q thread.
I recommend it be limited to private ping, like BDS and other speculative content.
ThankQ to LJ for bringing posting a query about this content to me, and ThankQ to foldspace for supporting us with shareable content explaining why this content is not appropriate for Q threads.
CLICK HERE TO READ FOLDSPACE's POST ABOUT LC
I am sorry to disappoint those who enjoy searching LC content for clues and usable nuggets.
ThankQ
2nd placemark