Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky

In many places they were not allowed cells and if they did they were thrown out. Only the democrat workers were feed and had cells. The fact they were not allowed to view close enough to read ballots were against the law. The democrat workers weren't sitting 6 feet away from each other. Some were allowed every so often to walk closer in a certain area. One lady watched a man with a roll of white out paper open a machine and replaced the strip inside with the machine reads the number on the ballot.. But spraying the inside down with a can that looked like WD40.


4,893 posted on 11/29/2020 6:33:58 PM PST by STARLIT (“WE CAN'T DIRECT THE WIND BUT WE CAN ADJUST OUR SAILS" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4882 | View Replies ]


To: NIKK
"One lady watched a man with a roll of white out paper open a machine and replaced the strip inside with the machine reads the number on the ballot.. But spraying the inside down with a can that looked like WD40."

I understand all that, but she needs to be able to put a name to this person, so he could be subpoenaed to state if he did that or not, and if he did why? Otherwise it is just someone saying I saw. It is also a PROVEN fact what someone thinks they saw is not always correct.

" Research has found that eyewitness-identification testimony can be very unreliable. ... Although witnesses can often be very confident that their memory is accurate when identifying a suspect, the malleable nature of human memory and visual perception makes eyewitness testimony one of the most unreliable forms of evidence."

4,910 posted on 11/29/2020 6:51:49 PM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4893 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson