Need Some Help on This One: "Hammer and Scorecard", or Dominion, SOE, Clarity and Scytl ?

A Free Market... is one in which there is NO FRAUD, NO MONOPOLY... and NO BARRIERS TO PARTICIPATION...

How does that short description of freedom in its economic aspect... align with our reality today... even only in terms of the election ?

No fraud ?

No evidence of context being dominated by monopolies ?

No evidence of anyone being shut out of rightful participation ?

Is it a free election or not ?

Lin Wood Outlines Case for Rampant Voter Fraud, GA Vote Corruption; GA Election will Be Nullified

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2OHdRUM9Gc&feature=youtu.be

Sidney Powell’s Partial Brief Posted

https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1328495485007646720

Makes it clear only in one aspect... that proofs “computerized election fraud can happen” is a slam dunk.

It’s REAL. Some very particular bubbles will be popping.

By using Smartmatic and the connection to Venezuela... the balance of power in public perception of the argument is shifted to ground in which the existing awareness (if not the dynamic) already puts most observers on the same side as Powell’s presentation... using the already extant public awareness that Venezuela’s elections are fraudulent.

Quality judo move, Sidney...

Other aspects are less clear... including that, given what careful observers can see that others may not... another slam dunk also exists, and runs closely in parallel... as other proof(s)... beyond one in Venezuela... clearly do exist.

Assume they might well opt to use other proof(s) in parallel, rather than only the legacy in proof apparent in Venezuela ? Don’t miss the plural... and its implication ?

Every prosecutor... and perp... knows how this works...

We see the “expert” who created this for Venezuela... and we know there are other experts, similar, already engaged...

Whatever name you call it... someone coded that function... and they knew what it was when they did it. They might have been lied to about why it was desired, and how it might be used ? They probably didn’t sign up to be made bagholders ?

One less obvious element in that... is that around 72 million, probably somewhat more, by now, of the public ALREADY do not accept the media narrative in the faux outcome being fostered... the public are WAY ahead of the “leaders” in legislatures and the courts in this drama. That’s a part of what has Fox News execs shell-shocked that they lost 1/3 of their audience in a day... with a straw that broke the camels back... while the left is still claiming Biden has “elect” status, when it is clear as can be that the election HAS NOT been decided yet.

Just having to walk that back... to explain to people that they were lied to about the rules... that the election being called and Joe “anointed” (by who, with what claim to legitimacy ?) was “an error” ? That alone has impact... of the sort that attends to accelerate extent Momentum.

They will HAVE TO walk it back... reality alone requires that... and when they do, they’ll lose traction along with ground... because of the “mystery of momentum”.

Sidney has issued a warning shot... without revealing anything more than that she could spare the ammo. I judge it overly polite... but, maybe I’m a bit more pissed off.

The LOGIC of momentum shift... is that of reaching tipping points in chaos theory... commonly understood in social context as the Wizard of Oz exposed, or the Emperor Who Wore No Clothes revealed... camels reaching last straws... or Ponzi schemes collapsing. Those who still can’t see a way out of confusion masking their vision then... at dynamic inflection points... will need to be shown the new path. Others will simply note the shift by others, and what popularity requires now that has changed... and they will change to mirror that, too, for that reason alone.

That I’m not one to stick a finger in the air to test the breeze in making decisions... doesn’t mean I’m ignorant of the change in the weather as a storm approaches ?

Many still, I think, (including Tucker Carlson) fail to fully comprehend the larger meaning of the stampede away from Fox News... and the explosion in the alternatives. It’s a tipping point... meaning further accelerations in the same direction are almost inevitable. And, what will be the impact of THAT ? No one talking about it.

Fox being surly, waiting for the old flame to come back groveling...is entirely pointless... after the switch has been made, the sock drawer emptied... and the new arrangement is found, by those leaving, to be liberating and elevating... even exhilarating.

It is clear, already... that the fraud HAS BEEN EXPOSED... WILL BE EXPOSED MORE... and IT IS EASILY PROVEN...

Its engendering a changing of the tide...

In result, heads must roll... and they will... but whose ?

Stick a fork in Fox... they’re done. And, they’re about all that’s been holding the rest of them up... as having even a pretense of legitimacy.

The people get that, but many of the “leaders” might not... particularly the slower sorts. They’ll have to be told.

The choices that matter, not to the public, but to those “leaders” who do understand... and who are running scared... are more about WHOSE heads are going to roll... when it hits the fan... AS IT MUST AND WILL.

If we make this about Venezuela... perhaps that requires Hillary’s head, and that of George Soros... inconveniently having outed themselves at a particularly awkward moment.

If we make this about something a bit more domestic and a bit less global with a focus in the local origins... it means the heads collected will certainly need to include Bill Barr’s and Gina Haspell’s.

That might well explain some of the more unusual events seen recently... after they chatted with Mitch McConnell ?

And, of course... Esper... and the serially hysterical Brennan ?

Whatcha gonna do when they come for you...

When the house of cards collapses... who gets a paper cut ?

Was reading through the tweets... and saw a guy who changed his Twitter name with the prefix PRESIDENT ELECT-

https://twitter.com/MikeAyres11

It’s brilliant...

Imagine Kayleigh MacEnany refusing to accept questions unless the press addressed her as President Elect ? Salt the audience with new media... and have them use that... then only address their questions ?

Humor of that sort is DEVASTATING to priggish frauds...

First comments on strategy... Rough outline on Trump's paths to win the election... 1. Win the vote outright. Trump did that already, but fraud and "continuing to vote" (a redundancy) were enabled to alter the totals in the election result, after the fact. They made no mystery of the fact they would do that... Hillary announced it well ahead of time, thinking only those on her team would get it ? Unbelievable... 2. The legal strategy plays a role here... as well in other areas: Undo the fraud. If Trump wins his argument re Pennsylvania... which every legal scholar worth his salt says is almost inevitable... then he wins the election... in Pennsylvania. But, the SAME error was made deliberately in (at least) the other five states with similar "post-election issues". None of them seem to have changed the rules that applied in the election as conducted... by constitutionally legitimate means... and those are the EXACT SAME places where frauds are apparent ? Go figure. Today, it became pretty clear that Georgia has that same issue as Pennsylvania... as the Lin Wood lawsuit filed today makes that exact point. The others ? Just a matter of filing essentially the same thing in those other venues... if that's made necessary in other venues ? But, do you even need to do that ? If you don't need to do that... why bother doing it ? 3. If fraud is proven to be an issue in the election... in a particular state... that state's election is null and will be voided... perhaps by a judge... but, then, otherwise, even only by the inability (of state officials) to certify the election as NOT fraudulent... or, were the legislature to act to declare that its a spoiled election that cannot be certified, etc. 4. If the election is spoiled, can it be unspoiled ? How ? Probably won't happen without legal wrangling imposing delays... and/or new causes for additional legal wrangling. My guess is they'll try to un-spoil the elections as much as possible, because many other elections, Federal, state and local, will hang in the balance... we've seen change in result of un-spoiling elections already... and the effort in providing proof of the need is barely begun. 5. If not un-spoilable... the legislature's votes instead of the votes of the people will be used to appoint the electors in the Presidential races. In every contested state... that means Trump probably wins all of them. Pelosi says she'll refuse to seat those electors... and lacking a positive reason (as when a fraud is proven) or any authority otherwise to override the state's judgement... she'll probably lose that battle in the House itself, or at the SCOTUS... as that is a primary grant of power to the states that operates as a limit on Congress, unless the Congress changes the laws... which they cannot do ex post facto, or in violation of other limits. Also, though, un-spoiling the elections might change the composition of the House before it gets that far... and obviate other conflict ? A division exists between requirements for and timing in un-spoiling elections in the states... as between Presidential process, other Federal process, and state processes. Congressional races have to be decided before the Presidential race can be, as if the election is not able to be resolved by a >270 vote of electors appointed by the states, it must be resolved by Congress. Have heard some rubbish about Pelosi won't seat electors... but I don't see that she can interfere there. Electors are elected or appointed by the states, and they give their votes to the President of the Senate... not the House. Pelosi might still attempt to sit as a judge and refuse to seat Republicans. "Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members." She might claim the power of the House to be the judge of its own elections... gives her that power as Speaker of the House, to exercise as an executive power in lieu of the vote of whole House... and maybe she'll attempt a power grab ? It obviously won't wash if she directly contradicts election results, the state legislatures, and court decisions, or acts in furtherance of a proven fraud... and another limit exists in requiring 2/3 to expel a member... which she clearly won't have. Won't alter the fact in relation to Presidential outcomes anyway, given one vote per state... as Republicans will still easily control that majority. 6. If the tally of votes, once fraud is sorted out, and/or state legislators provide electors in lieu of the people in a spoiled election, and that still leaves neither candidate with 270 electors... only then will the House have power to decide the outcome... None of this becomes overly apparent in "results"... until we reach the deadlines when states are actually required to report results... December 8... and then, assuming issues of demonstrable fraud are not already resolved at state level, before that, other still unresolved legal battles will be joined immediately... probably to be decided by Dec 14th. The rulings of the court will have the power to roll back errors being reported... in the degree they can be rolled back... and in the degree they cannot, the state legislatures will be required to cure spoiled elections. "The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States." Election day, when voting for President... is A DAY. The Constitution gives power to the Congress, and no other, to choose WHICH day... only. This election... clearly not compliant with that requirement... creates a set of problems... but any effort in resolving the problems, or in failing to resolve them, both still massively biased in favor of Trump. But, then, indecision could drift for quite a while... but for just as long as it does... Trump remains President... leaving Biden, without >270, no viable path to winning. If Trump wins in court on the Pennsylvania question... we'll basically see the vote tally getting rolled back to exclude votes that were not compliant with the law, and, the election night totals they'd posted before they got jiggered at 4am with "late insertions" will likely prevail... at least in those states where that ruling applies. If it applies in all of the contested states... Trump wins them outright. If it doesn't, Trump still wins by default if Biden can't get to 270. All Trump has to do to win... is prevent Biden from winning in enough states... based on proofs of fraud in those states. If Trump does somehow hold Biden short of 270... then you get this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baCeMpAZIgI A bigger issue exists, still, with potential for proofs of computerized election fraud mattering... which, in election impact alone, could end up impacting 29 states (or more)... even when having ONE proof provided, with a finding of fraud by the courts, or a legislature, or as just happened in Georgia, even by one local precinct... requiring it cannot be avoided any more ? That one result... could eventually alter many more election results than people are considering possible, now. The impact on the outcome of the election contest between Trump and Biden... is separate from the MUCH LARGER issue of the proof in one instance also providing a requirement in the fact, the necessity, that its existence in one instance... requires a massive conspiracy existing... with that impacting many, many other instances ? To prevent the proof and declaration of the fraud... you have to succeed in preventing its exposure in EVERY PRECINCT. To enable the proof and declaration of the fraud... you have to succeed in ONE ? A conspiracy... requires... TWO ? And, there are FIVE states... inexplicably all violating the Constitution in the same way... in coordination ? "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power" ? Criminally... its RICO Act material... and sedition or treason. Constitutionally... its just not kosher... Those betting against Trump... are betting he'll opt to side-step fully proving the fraud... to sustain the fraud rather than expose it and "make waves" ? That has them essentially playing a game of chicken, with Trump's opponents betting he'll choose to pull that wall away rather than let them crash into it... which makes them stupid.

First comments on strategy...

Rough outline on Trump’s paths to win the election...

1. Win the vote outright. Trump did that already, but fraud and “continuing to vote” (a redundancy) were enabled to alter the totals in the election result, after the fact. They made no mystery of the fact they would do that... Hillary announced it well ahead of time, thinking only those on her team would get it ? Unbelievable...

2. The legal strategy plays a role here... as well in other areas: Undo the fraud. If Trump wins his argument re Pennsylvania... which every legal scholar worth his salt says is almost inevitable... then he wins the election... in Pennsylvania. But, the SAME error was made deliberately in (at least) the other five states with similar “post-election issues”. None of them seem to have changed the rules that applied in the election as conducted... by constitutionally legitimate means... and those are the EXACT SAME places where frauds are apparent ? Go figure.

Today, it became pretty clear that Georgia has that same issue as Pennsylvania... as the Lin Wood lawsuit filed today makes that exact point. The others ? Just a matter of filing essentially the same thing in those other venues... if that’s made necessary in other venues ? But, do you even need to do that ? If you don’t need to do that... why bother doing it ?

3. If fraud is proven to be an issue in the election... in a particular state... that state’s election is null and will be voided... perhaps by a judge... but, then, otherwise, even only by the inability (of state officials) to certify the election as NOT fraudulent... or, were the legislature to act to declare that its a spoiled election that cannot be certified, etc.

4. If the election is spoiled, can it be unspoiled ? How ?
Probably won’t happen without legal wrangling imposing delays... and/or new causes for additional legal wrangling.
My guess is they’ll try to un-spoil the elections as much as possible, because many other elections, Federal, state and local, will hang in the balance... we’ve seen change in result of un-spoiling elections already... and the effort in providing proof of the need is barely begun.

5. If not un-spoilable... the legislature’s votes instead of the votes of the people will be used to appoint the electors in the Presidential races. In every contested state... that means Trump probably wins all of them. Pelosi says she’ll refuse to seat those electors... and lacking a positive reason (as when a fraud is proven) or any authority otherwise to override the state’s judgement... she’ll probably lose that battle in the House itself, or at the SCOTUS... as that is a primary grant of power to the states that operates as a limit on Congress, unless the Congress changes the laws... which they cannot do ex post facto, or in violation of other limits. Also, though, un-spoiling the elections might change the composition of the House before it gets that far... and obviate other conflict ?

A division exists between requirements for and timing in un-spoiling elections in the states... as between Presidential process, other Federal process, and state processes. Congressional races have to be decided before the Presidential race can be, as if the election is not able to be resolved by a >270 vote of electors appointed by the states, it must be resolved by Congress.

Have heard some rubbish about Pelosi won’t seat electors... but I don’t see that she can interfere there. Electors are elected or appointed by the states, and they give their votes to the President of the Senate... not the House.

Pelosi might still attempt to sit as a judge and refuse to seat Republicans. “Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members.” She might claim the power of the House to be the judge of its own elections... gives her that power as Speaker of the House, to exercise as an executive power in lieu of the vote of whole House... and maybe she’ll attempt a power grab ? It obviously won’t wash if she directly contradicts election results, the state legislatures, and court decisions, or acts in furtherance of a proven fraud... and another limit exists in requiring 2/3 to expel a member... which she clearly won’t have.

Won’t alter the fact in relation to Presidential outcomes anyway, given one vote per state... as Republicans will still easily control that majority.

6. If the tally of votes, once fraud is sorted out, and/or state legislators provide electors in lieu of the people in a spoiled election, and that still leaves neither candidate with 270 electors... only then will the House have power to decide the outcome...

None of this becomes overly apparent in “results”... until we reach the deadlines when states are actually required to report results... December 8... and then, assuming issues of demonstrable fraud are not already resolved at state level, before that, other still unresolved legal battles will be joined immediately... probably to be decided by Dec 14th.

The rulings of the court will have the power to roll back errors being reported... in the degree they can be rolled back... and in the degree they cannot, the state legislatures will be required to cure spoiled elections.

“The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.” Election day, when voting for President... is A DAY. The Constitution gives power to the Congress, and no other, to choose WHICH day... only. This election... clearly not compliant with that requirement... creates a set of problems... but any effort in resolving the problems, or in failing to resolve them, both still massively biased in favor of Trump.

But, then, indecision could drift for quite a while... but for just as long as it does... Trump remains President... leaving Biden, without >270, no viable path to winning.

If Trump wins in court on the Pennsylvania question... we’ll basically see the vote tally getting rolled back to exclude votes that were not compliant with the law, and, the election night totals they’d posted before they got jiggered at 4am with “late insertions” will likely prevail... at least in those states where that ruling applies. If it applies in all of the contested states... Trump wins them outright. If it doesn’t, Trump still wins by default if Biden can’t get to 270.

All Trump has to do to win... is prevent Biden from winning in enough states... based on proofs of fraud in those states. If Trump does somehow hold Biden short of 270... then you get this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baCeMpAZIgI

A bigger issue exists, still, with potential for proofs of computerized election fraud mattering... which, in election impact alone, could end up impacting 29 states (or more)... even when having ONE proof provided, with a finding of fraud by the courts, or a legislature, or as just happened in Georgia, even by one local precinct... requiring it cannot be avoided any more ? That one result... could eventually alter many more election results than people are considering possible, now.

The impact on the outcome of the election contest between Trump and Biden... is separate from the MUCH LARGER issue of the proof in one instance also providing a requirement in the fact, the necessity, that its existence in one instance... requires a massive conspiracy existing... with that impacting many, many other instances ?

To prevent the proof and declaration of the fraud... you have to succeed in preventing its exposure in EVERY PRECINCT. To enable the proof and declaration of the fraud... you have to succeed in ONE ?

A conspiracy... requires... TWO ?

And, there are FIVE states... inexplicably all violating the Constitution in the same way... in coordination ?

“No State shall, without the Consent of Congress... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power” ? Criminally... its RICO Act material... and sedition or treason. Constitutionally... its just not kosher...

Those betting against Trump... are betting he’ll opt to side-step fully proving the fraud... to sustain the fraud rather than expose it and “make waves” ? That has them essentially playing a game of chicken, with Trump’s opponents betting he’ll choose to pull that wall away rather than let them crash into it... which makes them stupid.

It’s refreshing to see a post without all those tedious paragraph breaks.

LOL!! Yeah. Thanks. I’ve not been posting anywhere that requires html skills in a while.

Not making that a priority at the moment, either...

Anti-Trump Engineer Of Dominion Voting Systems Said “I Made Sure Trump’s Not Gonna Win” In Secret Call With Antifa Claims Man Who Infiltrated Group

https://en-volve.com/2020/11/16/anti-trump-engineer-of-dominion-voting-systems-said-i-made-sure-trumps-not-gonna-win-in-secret-call-with-antifa-claims-man-who-infiltrated-group/

One of Viva Frie’s recent VLOGs made the point that the best possible case any lawyer can make... is the one in which the defendant tends to impeach himself for you and testify against himself in his own words and by his own deeds. It does appear, based on his own posting history, that the Dominion Voting Systems Vice President of U.S. Engineering is just about as seriously unhinged with TDS as Comrades Brennan and Comey...

How much legal traction is there to be gained from a first hand account of an infiltrator, remembered after the fact, is another matter. Is there any more to the story than “that’s what I heard” ?

Still, have to assume that there’s enough out there that the Dominion TDS guy will likely be called as a witness at some point. Hopefully that will happen in a forum covered by C-Span to enable capturing the full effect...

Kraken = Tuesday ? Just a rumor I’ve heard...

Stunning: Democrat Groups Affidavits Prove Presidents Case in PA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCdb0r6Xm2Y

Tracy Beanz apparently shows Democrats intervening in Trumps Lawsuit in Pennsylvania might have accidentally EXPOSED an additional source of fraud: “They just submitted sworn affidavits showing that the law was broken”.

The sworn statements show that voters were contacted BY THE DEMOCRAT PARTY to cure defective ballots... when the law seems it requires that the ballots, once received, are to be “safely kept in sealed or locked containers”... and not subjected to any election officials or others scrutiny... until a pre-canvassing on the day before election day.

It appears voters were also allowed to cure defective mail-in ballots in violation of the law.

The filing reads: Act 77 mandates that all properly cast absentee and mail-in ballots are to be “safely kept in sealed or locked containers”.

A few lawyerly words there, perhaps, in “properly cast”... but it appears the law intends that the ballots will be received and then isolated, stored securely, without anyone having access to them, or looking at them.

If Democrats had unauthorized access to the ballots some multiple of days prior to election day... which this says happened... that opens a whole new can of worms...

Here’s How State Legislatures Can Save a Stolen Election

https://nationalfile.com/heres-how-state-legislatures-can-save-a-stolen-election/

Faux Georgia “Recount”: RNC Monitor Catches Election Worker in Georgia Switching Trump Votes to Biden

https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/16/rnc-monitor-catches-election-worker-in-georgia-switching-trump-votes-to-biden/

Are Democrats Violating Fund Raising Limits to Contest Election Lawsuits ?

https://nationalfile.com/video-biden-implies-harris-is-feeding-him-classified-info-from-her-seat-on-intel-committee/

Robert Barnes tweeted out a link this morning to https://www.HereIsTheEvidence.com.

It advertises itself as an archive for people to submit and review evidence of “irregularities” in the disputed 2020 election.

Breaking Tonight: Wayne County, Michigan refuses to certify the results of the election, since they know they can’t legitimately claim the result is not fraudulent.

Letter from 10 Michigan Senators to Secretary of State requesting full audit.

As far as chaos and tipping points... probably safer downstream from Three Gorges.

Major Developments in Key States Sidney Powell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMDtOtGFrYg

Greg Kelly on Newsmax with Sidney Powell

Most worthy of note isn’t the content, which I assume most reading this will be keeping up with tonight.

Sidney tends to telegraph her stress and anxiety.

Pretty clear, I think, that her appearances the last few days have shown quite a lot of disconnects... not at all in her words or logic... but in the level stress and anxiety tied to an underlying the need to rapdily assemble a puzzle from a jumble of peices and have it make a useful picture.

Seeing the outlines in the obvious, in broad strokes, isn’t the same thing as having the fine detail in high resolution full color images that will convince others...

Tonight... instead of stress, she’s relaxed... there are smiles... while she’s talking about peoples lives being put at risk...

Tipping points clearly apparent there, too...

For me, the link ended, and it rolled right into this:

BREAKING: Josh Hawley Uncovers SECRET Facebook Content Monitoring..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBJx9kqa9bc

That’s EXTREMELY relevant to Sidney closing remarks...

And, for me... I was watching that feed live earlier today... and when it reached was being said at 00:26 here:

“Except this time, you’re the robber barons. Your companies are the most powerful companies in the world, and I want to talk about how you’re coordinating together to control information” and the feed dropped.

Youtube dropped the feed... and along with it took down all the political links on my screens at the time... leaving them about half vacant... with a bunch of crap I’d never watch in the unaffected links still being shown...

I had to reboot my TV, my router, and my cable box... to get it back. And, then, no search would get me back to the live link I’d been watching.

They were censoring my news feed... not wanting me to hear what Hawley just said... ?

So VERY fitting this is there now... following where it does.

In Georgia, today...

Once... might be human error.

Twice... a coincidence.

Three times... a pattern.

Pennsylvania court case monitoring:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18618673/donald-j-trump-for-president-inc-v-boockvar/

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3907277/posts?page=1