It seems obvious that Trump won GA, AZ, NV, MI, WI, PA, and NC by very comfortable margins.
I don’t know about your specific point, but it’s completely irresponsible and devious for the news organizations to be calling Biden ‘president-elect’, when there are going to be so many lawsuits filed and investigations demanded.
I thought today that they are just stoking potential outrage in the event that Trump turns out to have honestly won.
Fox was getting better after the ‘Me-again’ debacle - for which I left them, but returned for Tucker and Lou Dobbs. But FOX certainly isn’t our friend at all. They are alienating their largest fan base, and seem to have lost their minds.
Some thoughts:
Ebenezer raises a VERY good question, but let me address it another way. Because of the almost laughable levels of fraud-—in very specifically targeted places-—NO statistics or conclusions coming from this election should ever be viewed as valid for any purpose. This includes for historical study, for political science, for “polling.” NOTHING.
You have Donald Trump within NINE of winning NY . . . but losing the national popular vote and EC (supposedly). You have Trump up 600,000 in MI, then the next minute he’s down by 150,000.
FL is the only place we can really look at the results of the election with any confidence. Why? Of all people, Yeb put in some voting controls back after W almost lost. Thus despite VBM and IPEV, it turns out that the margins in FL were . . . wait for it . . .
EXACTLY what SpeedyinTexas, Ravi, byecomey, and bort projected. Trump won by over 200,000 and close to 3%. As predicted by us and Baris, he got almost exactly 50% of the Hispanic vote. He got 12% of the black vote (I’ve been on record for 2 years saying he’d get 12-15% of the black vote) and another 4% stayed home (I said 5%). We flipped two House seats there. In other words, the one place we had an honest election looked exactly like all of us projected it.
But Biteme getting 71 or 72m? Geddouddatown. That’s absurd on its face. BTW, this explains why ZERO did not want to campaign for Biteme: he knew this kind of fix was in, he knew it would goose the popular “vote” beyond his own levels, and he didn’t like it!
As another Freeper noted earlier today, Trump won NINE OUT OF TEN of the nation’s “bellwether” counties, including the all important Vigo. He won all five of the top five . . . but “lost.”
Further, this now returns the pollsters to their positions as “predictors.” Convenient, huh?
So to answer Ebenezer’s question, no there never were “battleground” states because the fraud machines were fully humming. But where there were good laws and a GOP governor ready to enforce them (i.e., FL), amazing! No fraud.
Something to ponder: What’s different since 2016?
“They never thought she would lose”. Yet she did.
They blamed Jill Stein but they lost MI, WI, and PA to Trump. Are we seeing the result of what has been planned and implemented in secret since then to prevent that from happening again, regardless of 3rd party candidates?
We know now why Hillary said “Biden will never concede on election night”. They knew they could make sure he didn’t have to.
This may already be going on without our knowledge, but while they’re at it, Trump’s support team should look for incriminating e-mails, telephone calls, and Project Veritas-style videos showing the fraud plans in progress.
Did you see more than 100 or 200 people at any Biden rally, or more than a dozen at a Kamala rally?
Did you see more than 2 or 3 thousand people at EVERY RALLY COMBINED for Pedo Joe and the Ho?
No, never did.
I agree with your premise. And I agree that Dems focused their fraud on those states.
I don’t want to tell them how to commit fraud better next time, but...
The fact that Trump improved upon his 2016 New York performance by 8.5 points is significant. There’s no way Trump closed the gap in NY by 8.5 points but lost ground in WI, MI, PA, AZ, GA, NC.
IMHO