Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz

Great stuff, Laz! Great work. Thank you, on behalf of all Georgia patriots — and Trumpians. You’ve given me confidence Georgia is going to beat this fraud!

In Clarke County (Athens City) where I live and voted, we had a new ballot system that I’d never seen before. [You’d think that the State or City government would explain these things ahead of time — but that complaint is for another day.]

The voting system had me use a computer display where I used a pen to make selections. Then when I finished, a printer next to the display printed out a card-stock white ballot (8.5 x 11 inches) with the names of people I voted for printed on it.

I then walked over to a clerk and she supervised me as I inserting my ballot (printed side down) into a large electronic-looking box with an automated insertion feed. And the clerk told me this was a locked box.

My question (for anyone who knows) — how was my printed ballot in that box used and guarded? Did the electronic machine I made my selections on feed my result into a separate software system? Was that used to count my vote?

Or was the printed ballot itself used to count my vote by machine reader?

Thanks...


197 posted on 11/08/2020 4:47:25 PM PST by poconopundit (Hard oak fist in an Irish velvet glove: Kayleigh the Shillelagh we salute your work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: poconopundit; real saxophonist; The Toll; LS; FreedomPoster
Just got in contact with my GA political contact. Points made:

1) Kemp is no friend of Trump and would be willing to let him go down, however, the thing to remember is, if fraud was capable on Trump, you, Kemp, are next. Self-preservation is a powerful motivator.

2) For the Jan 5 runoffs, it is imperative that TRUE ENFORCEMENT of poll watching and validity checking occur. That means boots on the ground, sent by the governor.

The 3rd point, which my pol friend will hear next, is that a recount is important, thus:

A complete hand-recount with dem and rep observers present. No breaks, no shut-downs, nothing. Problem: The dem observer would gum up the works, taking 5 minutes to examine each ballot.

A machine recount, but it would require:
A) a series of test counts to make sure the software is legit.
B) NO repeat NO software updates thereafter, then
C) A machine recount using the existing guarded machines, with
D) NO breaks, repeat NO breaks. If you have to piss, here's a bucket.

212 posted on 11/08/2020 5:06:59 PM PST by Lazamataz ("We beat the Soviet Union, then we became them." - 2005, my quote. I never knew how prescient I was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

To: poconopundit

The latter is my understanding.


380 posted on 11/09/2020 2:02:25 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson