(RESEARCH THREAD) The Anatomy of This Particular Steal

Freeper collaberation | 11/8/2020 | By Laz A. Mataz and LilFarmer (so far)

[Lazamataz]

PLEASE NOTE. THIS IS A RESEARCH THREAD. I NEED ALL HANDS ON DECK TO PROVIDE AS MUCH EVIDENCE, HARD EVIDENCE, AS POSSIBLE. I WILL MONITOR THIS THREAD AND COMPILE ALL CONTRIBUTIONS TO A NEW AND REFINED THREAD. I HOPE TO ACCOMPLISH THIS BY TONIGHT. I NEED YOUR HELP!

This election has been stolen. Pure and simple.

Now we must show the world, before December 13^th when the Electors are appointed, and before the Special Elections occur for various runoffs that will happen (for example, in Georgia, for the Senate seats, on January 5^th.

How did it occur, you may ask.

It was twofold: One, certain ballot counting machines were altered to give a particular percentage advantage to Joe Biden. It would subtract votes from Donald Trump, and give them to Joe Biden. These machines are provided by a company owned and managed by the Clintons and / or the Obamas. That company is called Dominion Voting Systems. There are various models of the vote tabulation machines. There is a rumor that the software is called Hammer and Scorecard, but it is meaningless what the software is called, more important is its function, described above.

The night of the election, it was becoming apparent to the powers that exist in the Democrat Party that the software boost would not be enough. Donald Trump was racking up very substantial leads, enough to swamp the artifically-inflated advantage to Biden that the software was creating. Suddenly, various excuses emerged on why certain precincts in swing states needed to stop counting. Those precincts sent Republican observers home, with the promise the precincts would continue that next morning. In Georgia, those precincts were, at least in-part:

Fulton 03D
EP04C
SC15A
SC17B
03P2
04A
JC01A
SC08G
01I
CP04A
Not Reporting CP084
Not Reporting SC08H
Not Reporting UC01D

Fortunately, yours truly happened to record those precints, again in-part, and their status, on the morning of November 4^th, in a thread located here: Georgia Fraud Watch information

THE FIRST COMPONENT OF THE STEAL

The first component of The Big Steal is the vote counting machines. Certain machines were altered to undercount Trump votes and overcount Biden votes. We do not know the exact percentage of vote conversions, but whatever it was, the Democrat Powers believed it would be enough to take Biden over the top in several swing-states. Those states are: Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Missouri. There are other states that use this software, but they do not seem to have been terribly effected.)

Here is as much proof as I can provide. I want good Freepers to provide as much additional proof as possible downthread.

• A poll watcher saw someone put an update on the Dominion Voting System computer JUST before the voting and tabulation began happening. That late of an update does not provide Republican experts the chance to review the code for fraudulent counting algorithms, and besides, one would need to see the code. I have found an article detailing this very suspicious computer update: Update (1100ET): Further down the 'Domminion Voting System' rabbit-hole, Politico reports that a technology glitch that halted voting in two Georgia counties on Tuesday morning was caused by a vendor uploading an update to their election machines the night before, a county election supervisor said.

• An election clerk in Michigan discovered that the vote total counted by the software did not match the printed tabulator tapes.

• FULTON COUNTY, Ga. (WTOC) -Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger released a statement on Twitter Saturday announcing that Fulton County has discovered an issue involving reporting from their work on Friday.. Reportedly, that 'issue' has caused incorrect totalling of ballots to occur in certain counties, most notably Chatham and Fulton.
  
  
• In the same state, Georgia, one of the updates was submitted on November 6^th: 8:45 p.m. | Computer malfunctions in Gwinnett have meant that everyone has gone home except the IT folks.
  Unsupervised. Only the IT people. No Republican observers. Im IT, and I'm very uncomfortable with that. This was in Gwinnett county.
  
  THE SECOND COMPONENT OF THE STEAL

  Once it became obvious that the software intended to switch a number of votes from Trump to Biden was simply insufficient to overcome Trump's natural lead, the swing states targeted by the Democrat Powers swung into action.

• Within hours of one another, these swing states began claiming they needed to stop counting until the next morning.Yet, obviously, after the Republican observers foolishly believed these people, the counting ramped up with no Republican observers present.

• In Michigan, they closed the counting before midnight (Note, I could use proof of time), promising to reconvene at 9AM. Yet, these same people submitted new counts at 3AM -- impossible, if they stopped counting. Here is the proof of the Michigan 3AM vote injection.

• Michigan's corrupted vote counters spent the interim manufacturing these Biden ballots, 100% of which were for Joe Biden, but ONLY Joe Biden. NO downticket votes. These corrupt workers did not have the time to mark the downtickets. They were under extremely tight timeframes.

• Interestingly, Snopes and all the other 'false' fact checkers state that the jump was because of a typo. The number, according to them, should have been 153,710 Biden, 23,154 Trump..
  NOT STATISTICALLY POSSIBLE. As late as January of 2019, the BBC reports: "Because Michigan voters aren’t required to register their party affiliation, there’s no way to know for sure how many Democrats versus Republicans live in Shiawassee County. However, county leaders have said they believe the political makeup here is roughly split evenly between Republicans and Democrats."

• Again in Michigan, there were confirmed reports that Republican poll watchers were instructed to stand 100 feet from the counters, and had their vision blocked by people papering over the windows through which they were permitted to view, and even having a forklift running in front of them (obscuring their vision). (Note, can some of you researchers provide me links to these three assertions?)
• In Georgia, the same shutdown occurred at 10:30 PM. Republican observers were sent home, proof of which is here. Though the counting was supposed to have stopped at 10:30 PM, vote counts SHARPLY jumped for Democrats between 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM, proof of which can be seen here.

  PROOF, by screen capture, that strongly suggests that the vote counting was (purposefully) flawed. It can be presumed that those votes went to Joe Biden. The first capture was at 12:03, Jo Jorgenson had 89,025 votes. Then at 12:15, she had 46,987 votes.

  

  Time is moving forward. Because of that, I will post this article as-is with the thought I will post refined versions downthread. Please, you who can contribute more information, please do, and I will incorporate it if it seems to fit this article's purpose.

[SteveH]

louie gohmert just appeared on newsmax (the chris salcredo show).

he alleged that the bankrupt scytl in barcelona is potentially involved in the election fraud. he alleged that us army soldiers were sent to scytl hq in barcelona from germany in order to secure scytl servers.

[SteveH]

scytl article fr discussion thread links

http://freerepublic.com/tag/scytl/index?tab=articles

[LilFarmer]

Adding to my post above about Dominion Security Director (Antifa supporter, Trump hater)

Coomer was named in the April 2020 lawsuit against GA SOS (Against using Dominion software) and his position with Dominion is on record in that lawsuit.

He also is one of the patent holders
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/eric-coomer

[Trillian]

[GOYAKLA]

F-—
Rinos
And
Useless
Democrats

[LilFarmer]

It’s a real mess

[SteveH]

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-did-dominion-voting-systems-cause-widespread-voter-fraud-trump-claims-1547038

[SteveH]

non-tech discussion of rlas in the 2020 ga election

https://thefulcrum.us/voting/georgia-election-audit

[SteveH]

are rlas intended to detect electoral fraud???

i am just doing a quick wiki definitional scan, but i do not see this concern addressed.

---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk-limiting_audit

[last changed 2020 sept 3]

[summary(?)]

A risk-limiting audit (RLA) is one way of checking whether computers tallied an election accurately. It involves (1) storing paper ballots securely until they can be checked,[1] (2) manually comparing a statistical sample of paper ballots to the computers’ records for those same ballots,[2] and (3) checking whether all the computer records of ballots in the election were totalled correctly.[3]

Advantages of an RLA include: samples can be small and inexpensive if the margin of victory is large;[3] there are options for the public to watch and verify each step;[1] and errors found in any step lead to corrective actions, including larger samples, up to a 100% hand count if needed. Disadvantages include: the sample needs to be a large fraction of all ballots to minimize the chance of missing mistakes, if any contest is close; and it is hard to check computer totals publicly, except by releasing computer records to the public.[4] If examining sampled ballots shows flaws in ballot storage, the usual approach cannot recover correct results,[5] and researchers recommend a re-vote if the number of ballots held in flawed storage is enough to change winners.[6] An alternative to re-votes is to create and verify backups of the paper ballots soon after they are voted, so there is an alternative to flawed storage of the original ballots.

As with other election audits, the goal is to identify not only intentional alterations of ballots and tallies, but also bugs in election machines, such as software errors, scanners with blocked sensors[7] or scanners skipping some ballots. The approach does not assume that all ballots, contests or machines were handled the same way, in which case spot checks could suffice. The sample sizes are designed to have a high chance of catching even a brief period when a scratch or fleck of paper blocks one sensor of one scanner, or a bug or hack switches votes in one precinct or one contest, if these problems affect enough ballots to change the result.

Comparisons can be done ballot-by-ballot or precinct-by-precinct, though the latter is more expensive.[8]

[...]

---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud

[last edit: 2020 nov 12]

[summary(?)]

Electoral fraud, sometimes referred to as election fraud, election manipulation, voter fraud or vote rigging, involves illegal interference with the process of an election, either by increasing the vote share of a favored candidate, depressing the vote share of rival candidates, or both.[1] It differs from but often goes hand-in-hand with voter suppression. What exactly constitutes electoral fraud varies from country to country.

Electoral legislation outlaws many kinds of election fraud,[2] but other practices violate general laws, such as those banning assault, harassment or libel. Although technically the term “electoral fraud” covers only those acts which are illegal, the term is sometimes used[by whom?] to describe acts which are legal, but considered morally unacceptable, outside the spirit of an election or in violation of the principles of democracy.[3][4] Show elections, featuring only one candidate, are sometimes classified[by whom?] as electoral fraud, although they may comply with the law and are presented more as referendums/plebiscites.

In national elections, successful electoral fraud on a sufficient scale can have the effect of a coup d’état,[citation needed] protest[5] or corruption of democracy. In a narrow election, a small amount of fraud may suffice to change the result. Even if the outcome is not affected, the revelation of fraud can reduce voters’ confidence in democracy. In April 2020 a 20-year review of voter fraud in the United States,[6] since it occurs only in “0.00006 percent” of instances nationally, and, in one state, “0.000004 percent — about five times less likely than getting hit by lightning in the United States.”[7]

[...]

Risk-limiting audits are methods to assess the validity of an election result statistically without the effort of a full election recount.

[note: conflicts with definition given in the risk-limiting audit entry(??); potentially misleading(??)]

[...]

[Tunehead54]

Has any info been forwarded to the Powers That Be and has it been acknowledged, if so?

ONE HOUR of experts on Dominion software and its complete power to leave Trump with one vote and Biden the rest and then be fed back to the TAlly servers to appear to be the “original data”. Must see (From Irish Eyes).
TH54

[Tunehead54]

I suppose an actual link could be useful. Sorry. ;-)

"Interview with Source on Electronic Vote Fraud"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=youtu.be&t=185

[M Kehoe]

Bttt.

5.56mm

[Steve Van Doorn]

This guy is a programmer that has been going over the code for Dominion
All eyes on Georgia Eyes
“The Hursti Hack was a successful attempt to alter the votes recorded on a Diebold optical scan voting machine. Dominion machines contain the famous Hursti Hack vulnerability, it was never fixed and used in 20 states for the 2020 election.

A later model of these same voting machines with the same vulnerabilities was used in the 2016 Georgia election between Brian Kemp and Stacy Abrams

I also posted a video about this hacker group which NBC news reported on before this election. This hacker group has been learning about this voting hack used in many previous elections.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4J1v4X9QQPA5/

[Steve Van Doorn]

Forgot the link to this programmer looking into Dominion
https://twitter.com/pepesgrandma/status/1327127401185366018

[Steve Van Doorn]

more on the Hursti Hack found in Dominion in this election
[EDIT] MICHIGAN 'GLITCH" A GLIMPSE INTO VULNERABILITY TO VOTE THEFT BUILT INTO DOMINION MACHINES
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IWxlchrTC7bI/

[MinorityRepublican]

Gov. Ron DeSantis ran a tight ship in Florida.

[Presbyterian Reporter]

“””Gov. Ron DeSantis ran a tight ship in Florida.”””

---

So why should other states be punished because most of the Battleground States in 2020 did not run a tight ship?

To me incompetence, corruption, and bad practices in the Battleground States become a Constitutional issue when it impacts those states who conducted elections on November 3 in a proper manner.

To me it requires a full audit of the processes used in the Battleground States and those states must show documentation they are above reproach.

If not, they lose their electoral votes.

[Sense]

Agree. Notice no one addressing the issue, yet, that Zuckerberg donating >$350 million to fund the hiring of (particular) local elections staff, pollworkers, etc., most notably in Fulton County Georgia, and in Philadelphia... is another instance of the end-around the authority of State Legislatures... in relation to determining the conduct of elections... as the "times, places and manner"... It is an unconstitutional usurpation of power... even in the simple and apparently benign element of funding the installation of ballot drop boxes... A valid argument... that every ballot dropped into a privately funded drop box... is an invalid vote. The effort made directly subverts the Legislatures in their most directive exercise of authority... appropriations and spending.

[Sense]

Posted elsewhere, but updating here...

The problem with the Sharpies in Arizona... isn’t an issue of the ballots marked by Sharpies being unable to be counted by the machine...

The issue is that giving one pen to one group, and another to another group... ensures that the ballots are being made identifiable... THUS ARE NOT SECRET BALLOTS... while ballots thus marked are also made subject to the corruption of the elections staff.

The violation, in result, includes violating the equal protection of those voters who are subjected to unique risks in having their ballots identified by unique markings... markings that are not unique because of their votes... but because the ballots have been made identifiable.

[Sense]

Robert Barnes tweeted out a link this morning to https://www.HereIsTheEvidence.com.

It advertises itself as an archive for people to submit and review evidence of “irregularities” in the disputed 2020 election.