(RESEARCH THREAD) The Anatomy of This Particular Steal

Freeper collaberation | 11/8/2020 | By Laz A. Mataz and LilFarmer (so far)

[Lazamataz]

PLEASE NOTE. THIS IS A RESEARCH THREAD. I NEED ALL HANDS ON DECK TO PROVIDE AS MUCH EVIDENCE, HARD EVIDENCE, AS POSSIBLE. I WILL MONITOR THIS THREAD AND COMPILE ALL CONTRIBUTIONS TO A NEW AND REFINED THREAD. I HOPE TO ACCOMPLISH THIS BY TONIGHT. I NEED YOUR HELP!

This election has been stolen. Pure and simple.

Now we must show the world, before December 13^th when the Electors are appointed, and before the Special Elections occur for various runoffs that will happen (for example, in Georgia, for the Senate seats, on January 5^th.

How did it occur, you may ask.

It was twofold: One, certain ballot counting machines were altered to give a particular percentage advantage to Joe Biden. It would subtract votes from Donald Trump, and give them to Joe Biden. These machines are provided by a company owned and managed by the Clintons and / or the Obamas. That company is called Dominion Voting Systems. There are various models of the vote tabulation machines. There is a rumor that the software is called Hammer and Scorecard, but it is meaningless what the software is called, more important is its function, described above.

The night of the election, it was becoming apparent to the powers that exist in the Democrat Party that the software boost would not be enough. Donald Trump was racking up very substantial leads, enough to swamp the artifically-inflated advantage to Biden that the software was creating. Suddenly, various excuses emerged on why certain precincts in swing states needed to stop counting. Those precincts sent Republican observers home, with the promise the precincts would continue that next morning. In Georgia, those precincts were, at least in-part:

Fulton 03D
EP04C
SC15A
SC17B
03P2
04A
JC01A
SC08G
01I
CP04A
Not Reporting CP084
Not Reporting SC08H
Not Reporting UC01D

Fortunately, yours truly happened to record those precints, again in-part, and their status, on the morning of November 4^th, in a thread located here: Georgia Fraud Watch information

THE FIRST COMPONENT OF THE STEAL

The first component of The Big Steal is the vote counting machines. Certain machines were altered to undercount Trump votes and overcount Biden votes. We do not know the exact percentage of vote conversions, but whatever it was, the Democrat Powers believed it would be enough to take Biden over the top in several swing-states. Those states are: Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Missouri. There are other states that use this software, but they do not seem to have been terribly effected.)

Here is as much proof as I can provide. I want good Freepers to provide as much additional proof as possible downthread.

• A poll watcher saw someone put an update on the Dominion Voting System computer JUST before the voting and tabulation began happening. That late of an update does not provide Republican experts the chance to review the code for fraudulent counting algorithms, and besides, one would need to see the code. I have found an article detailing this very suspicious computer update: Update (1100ET): Further down the 'Domminion Voting System' rabbit-hole, Politico reports that a technology glitch that halted voting in two Georgia counties on Tuesday morning was caused by a vendor uploading an update to their election machines the night before, a county election supervisor said.

• An election clerk in Michigan discovered that the vote total counted by the software did not match the printed tabulator tapes.

• FULTON COUNTY, Ga. (WTOC) -Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger released a statement on Twitter Saturday announcing that Fulton County has discovered an issue involving reporting from their work on Friday.. Reportedly, that 'issue' has caused incorrect totalling of ballots to occur in certain counties, most notably Chatham and Fulton.
  
  
• In the same state, Georgia, one of the updates was submitted on November 6^th: 8:45 p.m. | Computer malfunctions in Gwinnett have meant that everyone has gone home except the IT folks.
  Unsupervised. Only the IT people. No Republican observers. Im IT, and I'm very uncomfortable with that. This was in Gwinnett county.
  
  THE SECOND COMPONENT OF THE STEAL

  Once it became obvious that the software intended to switch a number of votes from Trump to Biden was simply insufficient to overcome Trump's natural lead, the swing states targeted by the Democrat Powers swung into action.

• Within hours of one another, these swing states began claiming they needed to stop counting until the next morning.Yet, obviously, after the Republican observers foolishly believed these people, the counting ramped up with no Republican observers present.

• In Michigan, they closed the counting before midnight (Note, I could use proof of time), promising to reconvene at 9AM. Yet, these same people submitted new counts at 3AM -- impossible, if they stopped counting. Here is the proof of the Michigan 3AM vote injection.

• Michigan's corrupted vote counters spent the interim manufacturing these Biden ballots, 100% of which were for Joe Biden, but ONLY Joe Biden. NO downticket votes. These corrupt workers did not have the time to mark the downtickets. They were under extremely tight timeframes.

• Interestingly, Snopes and all the other 'false' fact checkers state that the jump was because of a typo. The number, according to them, should have been 153,710 Biden, 23,154 Trump..
  NOT STATISTICALLY POSSIBLE. As late as January of 2019, the BBC reports: "Because Michigan voters aren’t required to register their party affiliation, there’s no way to know for sure how many Democrats versus Republicans live in Shiawassee County. However, county leaders have said they believe the political makeup here is roughly split evenly between Republicans and Democrats."

• Again in Michigan, there were confirmed reports that Republican poll watchers were instructed to stand 100 feet from the counters, and had their vision blocked by people papering over the windows through which they were permitted to view, and even having a forklift running in front of them (obscuring their vision). (Note, can some of you researchers provide me links to these three assertions?)
• In Georgia, the same shutdown occurred at 10:30 PM. Republican observers were sent home, proof of which is here. Though the counting was supposed to have stopped at 10:30 PM, vote counts SHARPLY jumped for Democrats between 1:00 AM and 2:00 AM, proof of which can be seen here.

  PROOF, by screen capture, that strongly suggests that the vote counting was (purposefully) flawed. It can be presumed that those votes went to Joe Biden. The first capture was at 12:03, Jo Jorgenson had 89,025 votes. Then at 12:15, she had 46,987 votes.

  

  Time is moving forward. Because of that, I will post this article as-is with the thought I will post refined versions downthread. Please, you who can contribute more information, please do, and I will incorporate it if it seems to fit this article's purpose.

[thecodont]

Some paper (early 2020)? on ballot marking devices (BDMs) and how votes can be flipped.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342256417_Ballot-Marking_Devices_Cannot_Ensure_the_Will_of_the_Voters

Ballot-Marking Devices Cannot Ensure the Will of the Voters

Andrew W. Appel, Richard A. DeMillo, and Philip B. Stark

ELECTION LAW JOURNAL
Volume 00, Number 0, 2020
#Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
DOI: 10.1089/elj.2019.0619

...

In this report we explain:
* Hand-marked paper ballot systems are the only practical technology for contestable, strongly defensible voting systems.
* Some ballot-marking devices can be software independent, but they not strongly software in- dependent, contestable, or defensible. Hacked or misprogrammed BMDs can alter election outcomes undetectably, so elections conducted using BMDs cannot provide public evidence that reported outcomes are correct. If BMD malfunctions are detected, there is no way to determine who really won. Therefore BMDs should not be used by voters who are able to mark an optical-scan ballot with a pen.
* All-in-one BMD or DRE+VVPAT voting machines are not software independent, contestable, or defensible. They should not be used in public elections.

...

If a hacker sought to steal an election by altering BMD software, what would the hacker program the BMD to do? In cybersecurity practice, we call this the threat model.

The simplest threat model is this one: In some contests, not necessarily top-of-the-ticket, change a small percentage of the votes (such as 5%). In recent national elections, analysts have considered a candidate who received 60% of the vote to have won by a landslide. Many contests are decided by less than a 10% margin. Changing 5% of the votes can change the margin by 10%, because ‘‘flipping’’ a vote for one candidate into a vote for a different candidate changes the difference in their tallies—i.e., the margin—by two votes. If hacking or bugs or misconfiguration could change 5% of the votes, that would be a very significant threat.

Although public and media interests often focus on top-of-the-ticket races such as president and governor, elections for lower offices such as state representatives, who control legislative agendas and redistricting, and county officials, who manage elections and assess taxes, are just as important in our democracy. Altering the outcome of smaller contests requires altering fewer votes, so fewer voters are in a position to notice that their ballots were misprinted. And most voters are not as familiar with the names of the candidates for those offices, so they might be unlikely to notice if their ballots were misprinted, even if they checked.

[SteveH]

ya, i am thinking along the same lines.

132K votes under suspicion from Shafer and co., and 138K votes under suspicion from my (presumed, quick) look-see. a difference of 6K votes (which could however at least in theory be accounted for by a submission from another county imho).

my brain also somewhat fried but right now if i can stay awake long enough i want to watch that bitchute video on how electronic vote fraud can be accomplished. it fills in (at least for me) a lot of holes on how the system actually works.

i’ll also take a look at the donald.win thread you link to (but there are 500+ responses to that, so...)

[RandallFlagg]

Wow.
Pretty blatant, aren’t they?

[SteveH]

a parting observation: 10:30 pm to 3:57 am leaves about a 5.5 hour window in which 138K votes percolate from fulton county (and potentially other counties to a much lesser degree) from the county database(s) to the election tabulation middleware (VR Systems, GCR, Arikaan, etc.) to the AP, Decision Desk, Edison Research, etc. and the MSM outlets. At internet speeds, that is plenty of time.

[SteveH]

one major thing that is missing is the minimum amount of time that it would take for a person to fill out a blank georgia ballot (perhaps checking only the president box for biden) to allow it to be considered valid and therefore tabulated.

if we have that, and presume that the opposition started from a standing start, we can find out how many person-hours it took to generate 138K ballots for stuffing.

5.5 hours is 330 minutes. if they skipped envelopes, at 1 ballot per person-minute, 1 person can generate 330 ballots.

138K ballots would be equivalent to 418 busy democrat drones.

(hmmm, that’s a lot of drones...)

iead- publicly offer a new tax free lambo plus limited immunity, and ideally someone from the team could be expected to come forward.

[SaintDismas]

Isn’t there somebody somewhere that “listened in” somehow somewhere that can prove this crap? I know there are a few recordings of nefarious crap but this is ridiculous

[SteveH]

i halfway expected to find, but could not find fulton county mentioned in the complaint trump filed in barrisburg earlier this evening.

[CivilWarBrewing]

I wonder what the code name was for this conspiracy by the Democrat party to STEAL the 2020 election away from President Trump... 'DARK WINTER', perhaps?

When Biden said he had "put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in history of American politics", HE WASN'T KIDDING!

[Steve Van Doorn]

Thank you Laz
Here is a group working on finding the web sites that hacked those election over the net. Yeah many of the voting and tabulating machines where ON LINE.
https://mobile.twitter.com/We_Have_Risen/status/1325140493567623169

neither DHS nor the FBI were interested in helping improve their security before the election. DHS said they agreed it was horrible but did nothing
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3904223/posts?page=1

[Steve Van Doorn]

To give you an idea. This is Georgia with all the voting machines and personal computers that where linked to them during the election

[Ancesthntr]

First, thanks for everything that you’ve done here. It is invaluable and may well help turn this thing back to what it should have been last week.

Second, I have some information - NOT direct knowledge, not even directly about fraud, but having to do with the opportunity to cheat. I have it on several key counties, but will post it now just for Wayne County, MI:

---

Here is a specific example of a jurisdiction in which there is a HUGE discrepancy between the number of registered voters and those who SHOULD be registered voters (i.e. a far lower number), take a look at Wayne County, Michigan (in which the city of Detroit is located).

According to Wikipedia, it’s 2019 population is 1,749,343. Of that number, (again according to Wikipedia), some 25.4% are under the age of 18 (and thus ineligible to even register to vote, let alone actually vote). This brings us to a maximum theoretical number of registered voters (if EVERYONE eligible registered - which NEVER happens) of 1,305,010. That is, itself, too high because that number assumes that every adult there is a citizen which, in a county of 1.75 million people, is impossible - but let’s disregard this last fact.

So, how many registered voters ARE there in Wayne County, Michigan, according to that county’s government? 1,406,353. Yes, that’s right, there are roughly 101,000 more people registered to vote in Wayne County than even the maximum theoretical number of registered voters...and if you assume that 81% of eligible voters actually registered (which is the average for MI, but much higher than the average of 67% throughout the US), then in reality there should be only 1,044,008 registered voters in Wayne County, which is about 362,000 less than what the county claims.

So, who got mail in ballots in Michigan? Apparently ALL registered voters https://www.reuters.com/.../us-usa-election-michigan... This necessarily means that some 362,000 mail in ballots went to people who are not, in fact, legal voters - they’re either dead, or they’ve moved out of Wayne County. How can anyone seriously contend that this is NOT ripe for fraud, particularly in or near Detroit, which is well known as being one of the most politically corrupt cities in the country. https://citizenwells.com/.../democrat-election-fraud.../ “

[SteveH]

doh, fulton is in georgia, not pennsylvania.

(it was getting late...)

[ScaniaBoy]

IT security in action! Who the h-ll allowed this?
And then the final vote data is sent off abroad and stored in Barcelona and Frankfurt!
WOW!

[Ancesthntr]

Oh, and to finish with Wayne County, its unofficial results for the election show 867,409 votes cast. If you use the 1,044,008 expected registered voters, that’s an 83% turnout rate - which is ABSURDLY high.

[ScaniaBoy]

Laz,

Thanks for all the work you are doing on this thread! Before this ia over we should download everything including screen captures of the text and pics behind the links to keep this for posterity. I am sure you can find many willing helpers on FR!!!

A comment from the Diplomad (a retired US diplomat - a staunch conservative, who has left the left-coast and settled in NC. He has run a wonderful blog for many years). It is to quote dr Fauci "just anecdotal", but nevertheless:

Fraud on a Retail Scale: Electoral Manipulation Hits Home

[Steve Van Doorn]

The states where setting these up in most case they're openly violating their own state laws. You might have seen this
Note he mentioned this white hat group tabulated the real vote (I think in the houston texas area.)
Interview with Source on Electronic Vote Fraud
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&feature=youtu.be&t=145

[Chgogal]

Wisconsin, possibly reversed.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3904178/posts

[SteveH]

doh, fulton is in georgia, not pennsylvania.

(it was getting late...)

[SteveH]

i was seeing what seem to my recollection to be comparatively high voting rates in different random counties that i was monitoring in arizona.

at the moment, it is making me question what constitutes a normal voting rate...

[ScaniaBoy]

Yes, thanks, I had seen it. A very powerful video. I must admit I was pretty certain that “Hammer” and “Scorecard” were mostly Internet rumors. But when Ramsden showed the architecture of the computer system, and the connection to the internet, that was an eye-opener for me. Whatever is true about those programs, it is absolutely certain that the voting system(s) are open to outside interference.

PS I get so d-mn upset with Youtube, Google, Twitter etc. Now this video is marked “adult content” and as someone who lives in the EU area (sigh!) I must be ready to verify my age before watching. Orwell’s 1984 was not supposed to be a manual!!!