https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/what-did-laura-show-jeb-at-pres-george-h-w-bushs-funeral
Ca 2001, for a client, I (as a consultant) met with the creators of a fluorescent isotope watermarking technology developed specifically as a potential security tool. (They were former reserchers at the Battelle Institute who retired and bought the rights to commercialize their work on Spectrally-specific phosphors they had been doing at Battelle.)
The phosphor pigment powders were mixtures of rare earth and isotopic materials that absorbed very narrow wavelength bands of UV light and "fluoresced" (re-emitted) light at visible wavelengths. Up to three (different-performing) phosphors were mixed in any single pigment composition.
At that time, the inventors were proposing the use of their phosphors for use in Olympic Games security (by invisibly watermarking tickets & attendee badges with icons visible only when illuminated by narrow-wavelength lasers). PURPOSE: Eliminate counterfeits & improve access security...
Nowadays, the encrypted dot pattern scheme speculated for the DHS/ballot watermarking proposed for ballots is ideally configured for machine reading.
IOW, the watermarking scheme mentioned by Piecznick(sp?) is both available and appropriate for forensic IDing of genuine ballots.
(BTW, the Battelle Memorial Institute lists National Security as one of their prime client areas. DHS/CISA could have dealt directly with Battelle on this ballot watermarking scheme...)
BOTTOM LINE: The concept of an invisible, digitally encoded and encrypted, machine-readable "Watermark" for ballots is 100% feasible and available.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I believe that by working together as a tiger teamof FReeQs we should be able to research enough evidence to counter the Negative Ninnies" "beyond the trees on FR who are running entire threads denigrating this probable key component of The PLAN. -- with FACTS...
what will watermarks show and how will they detect fraud other than counterfeit ballots?
Thanks for details. So such tech exists. And since it exists, very possible/likely that it was used. Exactly how I don’t know, since who or what prints up every states’ ballots I do not know.
Did you work on this project with the Battelle Institute ?
Awesome!
And if this is true, now Georgia is F*CKED. And so is BidenElection Summary Report for Gwinnet County, Georgia.
Total Population: 936,250
Total Registered Voters: 581,467
Voter Participation: 408,268 (70.21%)
Ballots Cast?
811,836.
1.36 ballots per registered voter.
1.99 ballots per participating voter.
🧐 pic.twitter.com/kDrreRBpfi— SlavTrapGod (@slavtrapgod) November 8, 2020