To: ransomnote
Can we all now agree that this Q business is BS?
To: Captain Jack Aubrey
27 posted on
11/07/2020 7:54:42 AM PST by
Wneighbor
(Weaponize your cell phone! Call your legislators every week.)
To: Captain Jack Aubrey
Q is not very good on offense, otherwise we wouldn’t be having this election bs. If Q is all knowing and can see the future, this would have been known and prevented.
40 posted on
11/07/2020 8:03:45 AM PST by
Pollard
(You can’t be for “defunding the police” and against “vigilantism” at the same time.)
To: Captain Jack Aubrey
Can we all now agree that this Q business is BS?Not seconded. Motion fails. Go back to your Fox News programming.
To: Captain Jack Aubrey
Can we all now agree that this Q business is BS? If we can all agree that you're a sorry sack of sh*t.
78 posted on
11/07/2020 8:41:31 AM PST by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: Captain Jack Aubrey
295 posted on
11/07/2020 1:08:26 PM PST by
campaignPete R-CT
(Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CREEP ))
To: Captain Jack Aubrey
“Can we all now agree that this Q business is BS?”
That statement is like going to someone else’s birthday party and taking that person’s gifts.
Why come on a Q thread and make that statement unless a TROLL.
To: Captain Jack Aubrey
Can we all now agree that this Q business is BS?
One hopes, but Im not counting on it. There were plenty of reasons to reject this stupid Q business well before the election yet this thread still exists.
988 posted on
11/08/2020 6:51:36 AM PST by
Stravinsky
(Politeness will not defeat the Marxist revolutionaries)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson