[WildHighlander57]

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3903053/posts?page=1259#1259

Ping;

makes mention of arguments based on statistics not being admissible in court, but gives a 14th amendment angle on the election situation.

[grey_whiskers]

From Instapundit tonight —
Here’s the cite about statistical evidence being allowed in court cases. Let’s see if it gets let thru

11 F.3d 1467 (9th Cir. 1993)

= = = = = = =

That’s a 9th Circuit case.

Here is a link to a bunch of other cases where statistical evidence has been allowed

forensus[dot]com/statistical-sampling-case-law/

Replace [dot] with . and you should be good to go

[grey_whiskers]

Was that a state judge (no effect on Feds) and was it citing precedent, or claiming to set precedent, or was it just one judge being a Derp?