It wasn’t too hard to find some sauce:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-177_b97c.pdf
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
ET AL. v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY
INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 19–177. Argued May 5, 2020—Decided June 29, 2020
KAVANAUGH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS,
C. J., and THOMAS, ALITO, and GORSUCH, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed a
concurring opinion. BREYER, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. KAGAN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
*************************
Judge Kavanaugh Rules Against George Soros Connected ‘Open Society’ – Preventing Foreign Funding When No Policy In Place Opposing Prostitution and Sex Trafficking As Required By Law
By Joe Hoft
Published August 14, 2020 at 7:22pm
The Supreme Court recently announced a decision by Judge Kavanaugh that directly addressed George Soros’s Open Society. The decision was a win for morality.
What’s creepy is that the Open Society was suing to enable its foreign entities to maintain policies that do not explicitly oppose prostitution and sex trafficking while obtaining US government funding. Open Society entities overseas claimed they should be eligible for government funding without having policies that oppose prostitution and sex trafficking. (Why the hell are Open Society entities anywhere receiving US government funding?)
ThankQ for this info!