The following presentation from the lawyers (Fuellmich et al) suing the W.H.O. EXPLAINS IT ALL:
Not only are PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly emphasized, he continued. Instead, they are simply incapable of diagnosing any disease.
Contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler [EU officials] and the WHO, a positive PCR test result does not mean that an infection is present, Fuellmich emphasized. If someone tests positive, it does not mean that they are infected with anything, let alone with a contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus.
In this context, Fuellmich referred to a publication of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that stated, Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.
The PCR swabs take one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the human eye and therefore need to be amplified in many cycles to make it visible, the lawyer explained. Everything over 35 cycles is as reported by The New York Times and others considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable.
In fact, the PCR test used to test for COVID-19 was first developed by Drosten [EU derp]. These tests, as Fuellmich said, are set to 45 cycles. Can that be because of the desire to produce as many positive results as possible and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?
CHINAVIRUS DATA: 1. United States CHINAVIRUS Confirmed Cases through about mid-June 2. Highly (and Deliberately) Contaminated Data from mid-June Forward (contaminated with antibody-test, duplicates, false positives and dubious "Probables") 3. Another Layer of Fraud in both deaths and Cases was added 7/28 Date New Total Daily Cases Cases Deaths Actual + FAKE Actual + FAKE 9/1/2020 45,775 6,257,571 1164 9/2/2020 33,166 6,290,737 1064 9/3/2020 44,507 6,335,244 1094 9/4/2020 53,813 6,389,057 1053 9/5/2020 42,095 6,431,152 707 9/6/2020 29,098 6,460,250 432 9/7/2020 25,325 6,485,575 334 9/8/2020 28,656 6,514,231 448 9/9/2020 35,244 6,549,475 1207 9/10/2020 38,688 6,588,163 1089 9/11/2020 48,084 6,636,247 1093 9/12/2020 40,354 6,676,601 707 9/13/2020 31,857 6,708,458 392 9/14/2020 40,831 6,749,289 480 9/15/2020 38,858 6,788,147 1197 9/16/2020 40,154 6,828,301 1151 9/17/2020 46,295 6,874,596 865 9/18/2020 51,345 6,925,941 958 9/19/2020 41,462 6,967,403 653 9/20/2020 37,365 7,004,768 294 9/21/2020 41,448 7,046,216 388 9/22/2020 51,721 7,097,937 965 9/23/2020 41,616 7,139,553 1122 9/24/2020 45,918 7,185,471 945 9/25/2020 58,713 7,244,184 902 9/26/2020 43,377 7,287,561 737 9/27/2020 33,752 7,321,313 276 9/28/2020 40,298 7,361,611 355 9/29/2020 44,495 7,406,106 977 9/30/2020 41,176 7,447,282 955 10/1/2020 47,389 7,494,671 920 10/2/2020 54,652 7,549,323 864 10/3/2020 51,523 7,600,846 753 10/4/2020 36,066 7,636,912 334 10/5/2020 42,732 7,679,644 421 10/6/2020 43,102 7,722,746 790 10/7/2020 53,478 7,776,224 962 10/8/2020 57,539 7,833,763 954 10/9/2020 60,715 7,894,478 910 10/10/2020 51,067 7,945,545 634 10/11/2020 46,453 7,991,998 413 10/12/2020 45,791 8,037,789 316 10/13/2020 52,464 8,090,253 862 10/14/2020 59,790 8,150,043 970 10/15/2020 66,272 8,216,315 874 10/16/2020 71,973 8,288,288 927 10/17/2020 54,377 8,342,665 638 10/18/2020 45,134 8,387,799 448 10/19/2020 68,854 8,456,653 492 10/20/2020 63,654 8,520,307 927 10/21/2020 64,512 8,584,819 1260 10/22/2020 76,832 8,661,651 972 10/23/2020 81,414 8,743,065 903 10/24/2020 84,867 8,827,932 784 10/25/2020 61,247 8,889,179 442 10/26/2020 73,604 8,962,783 535 10/27/2020 75,247 9,038,030 1,039 10/28/2020 82,721 9,120,751 1,046
I wonder what those PCR tests are even useful for. The huge increase in positives is absolutely insane. Even if 10% of these daily cases were sick enough to be hospitalized, which was a DCD derived number a while ago, we would see a huge increase of hospitalizations and rise in deaths. Which we aren’t afaik.
just saying thanks for the update.
I read your commentary and the numbers. Much appreciated btw
I am confused what this PCR test was designed for originally and if its shown repeatedly to not accurately detect the China virus, why do they continue to use it? Are there other testing methods not used and/or being discussed?
Thank you