To: Red Badger
Why are they “allowing” the painting to be displayed. It’s not theirs to loan. They received stolen property.
37 posted on
10/22/2020 1:33:13 PM PDT by
BubbaBasher
("Liberty will not long survive the total extinction of morals" - Sam Adams)
To: BubbaBasher
Where do you come up with stolen? Lost is not stolen. The large series was broken up for individual sales by a gallery in order to make money. A record of who bought each painting was not kept. Fast forward 50 years and it is decided by a museum to put the series back together for an exhibit. Several of the paintings are now considered “lost” just because no one remembers who bought them.
38 posted on
10/22/2020 1:44:47 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
(Follow your Inner Trump)
To: BubbaBasher
...who had purchased the painting at a friend's Christmas charity art auction in 1960.
49 posted on
10/23/2020 4:55:25 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Sine Q-Anon.....................very............)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson